From 'difficult to accept' to 'he's got a backbone': Tafoya's evolution on Trump
The article charts Tafoya’s shift from urging Trump not to run again to praising his leadership and policies.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Star Tribune is an established regional newspaper, and this report attributes Tafoya’s statements, describes its review method, and includes a response from her. The page provides a byline and publication details.
- Source type — Established regional newspaper with a local-news reporting role.
- Transparency — The article describes its review of podcast material and says Tafoya was asked to respond.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The publisher is an established newspaper; this page shows no specific correction or standards information.
The article draws on a large body of podcast material, quotes Tafoya directly, includes her response to questions, and provides counterevidence about DOGE’s savings claims. It offers less direct perspective from her opponent or other independent sources.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents Tafoya’s own explanations and includes information that challenges claims about DOGE savings, as well as context around January 6. It does not include a direct response from her opponent or extensive independent perspectives on the policies.
- Counterarguments presented — Includes the GAO’s assessment of DOGE savings and reports criticism of Tafoya’s alignment with Trump.
- Source diversity — Uses Tafoya’s statements, her written response, and a government watchdog assessment, but few other direct sources.
- Omitted context — The opponent is discussed but is not quoted directly.
- Loaded language — Generally attributes charged descriptions to their speakers rather than adopting them as the article’s own voice.
The report uses a largely descriptive tone and presents both Tafoya’s stated positions and information that qualifies some of her claims. Its focus on her change in views is the subject of the story rather than clear evidence of partisan framing.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral wording, with quoted assessments attributed to Tafoya.
- Source selection — Uses podcast statements, Tafoya’s response, and a Government Accountability Office assessment.
- Framing — Frames the article around the documented evolution of a Senate candidate’s views.
The Star Tribune traces Michele Tafoya’s shift from urging Donald Trump not to run again to praising his leadership and policies, based on a review of her podcast and her responses to the newspaper. Tafoya is now a Minnesota Senate candidate, and the article examines how her views may matter in the race.
The Star Tribune reviewed 350 hours of Tafoya’s podcast and described her change from a 2022 open letter urging Trump not to run again to saying in 2024 that she supported him with more enthusiasm. Tafoya told the newspaper she would work with Trump when he gets things right and criticize him when he gets things wrong. The article says she also supported his immigration enforcement and budget-cutting efforts.
The article reports that Tafoya praised Trump’s resolve and supported DOGE, while noting that the Government Accountability Office said DOGE’s estimated savings were incorrect or lacked supporting evidence. Tafoya said the Minnesota immigration operation was mishandled and that the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti were unacceptable, but she continued to describe immigration enforcement as necessary.
Community verdict
11 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Minnesota Senate candidate whose public views on Trump and his policies are the article’s focus.
President whose leadership and policies are the subject of Tafoya’s evolving public views.
Former president whom Tafoya criticized in a podcast discussion.
Minnesota governor whom the article says Tafoya’s podcast criticized.
Former Homeland Security secretary whom Tafoya said she was glad had been fired.
Tafoya’s Senate-election opponent, identified in the article as Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan.
Secretary of State, cited by Tafoya in a comparison about unelected officials.
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






