Jack Smith pressed on DOJ probes — and basketball
Schmitt questioned Smith about the investigations and his attendance at a basketball game.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRoll Call is an established national news outlet with a strong publisher rating from the site. The article names its author and attributes key claims and responses to hearing participants.
- Track record — The site rates the publisher 85 based on 95 stories.
- Source type — National news outlet with established reporting standards.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Transparency — The article attributes statements to named hearing participants and identifies the photographer.
The report identifies the hearing’s central disputes, provides context about the investigations and includes attributed statements from Smith, Republican critics and Democratic senators. It does not provide extensive independent verification or detailed responses to every allegation.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The report presents Republicans’ criticism alongside Smith’s replies and statements from Democratic senators defending the investigations. The range of perspectives is useful, though the article does not deeply examine the evidence behind each competing claim.
- Counterarguments presented — Smith responds to allegations about bias and investigative decisions; Democrats also challenge Republicans’ characterization.
- Source diversity — Includes statements from the former special counsel and senators from both parties.
- Omitted context — Limited space for detailed independent assessment of disputed investigative claims.
- Loaded language — Charged language is largely attributed to speakers rather than adopted by the article.
The article reports Republican allegations and Smith’s denials and explanations in relatively neutral language, while also including Democratic senators’ defenses of the investigations. Its focus on a contentious hearing does not itself indicate a political lean.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, with charged terms presented as quotations or attributed claims.
- Source selection — Includes Smith, Republican critics and Democratic senators.
- Framing — Organized around the hearing and its exchanges rather than an explicit political argument.
Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations of Donald Trump in a heated Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Senators challenged Smith over alleged political bias, congressional phone records and his attendance at a basketball game.
Jack Smith told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was not politically loyal and had not faced pressure to influence his decisions. He defended investigations into Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his retention of classified documents; both cases were dropped after Trump won reelection.
Republican senators, including Eric Schmitt and Chuck Grassley, accused Smith’s team of political bias and questioned its investigative methods. Smith defended obtaining congressional phone records, saying they showed call times, lengths and participants, but not call contents. Amy Klobuchar criticized Schmitt’s questioning about Smith’s attendance at a basketball game, while Richard Durbin argued that Republicans were ignoring evidence against Trump.
Community verdict
13 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senate Judiciary Committee chairman who criticized Smith’s investigations
Senator who criticized Schmitt’s accusation against Smith
Former attorney general who appointed Smith as special counsel
President whose conduct was investigated by Smith
Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member who defended the case against Trump
Part of a bigger story
12 OUTLETSFormer special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his investigations of Donald Trump. Eric Schmitt questioned him about an alleged Atlanta basketball-game visit; Smith said he attended a different game. Left-leaning outlets portray Schmitt’s questioning as a failed attack built on an apparent mix-up, and stress that he continued defending his accusation. Center outlets focus on the basketball-game discrepancy while also covering the broader hearing about Smith’s investigations and subpoenas. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Republican challenges to Smith over his Trump investigations, while also recounting the disputed basketball-game allegation.
- ARTICLES
- 16
- OUTLETS
- 12
- AVG CRED
- 69
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






