Sen. Kennedy Sums Up His Grilling of Kristi Noem and Trump's Response as Only He Can
Noem testified about a DHS ad campaign she approved before being removed as secretary.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is a conservative opinion outlet, and this piece is an individual author's commentary rather than a report built on broad independent sourcing. The byline is transparent, but the article relies heavily on Kennedy's account and advances an explicitly partisan interpretation.
- Source type — Opinion outlet; a strong prior for a lower institutional credibility score than a straight-news newsroom.
- Source diversity — The account centers on Kennedy's comments and provides little independent sourcing or competing perspective.
- Author attribution — The article names its author.
- Editorial standards — The article's openly partisan commentary makes neutral reporting standards less applicable.
The article provides a specific account of the hearing and Kennedy's reported call with Trump, but relies mainly on Kennedy's version and offers little independent verification, response from Noem, or context for the ad campaign.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives Kennedy's and Trump's side of the dispute and advances a favorable interpretation of Trump, without including Noem's perspective beyond the claim attributed to her or a broader independent account.
- Loaded language — The commentary uses partisan criticism of Democrats and explicit praise for Trump's approach.
- Counterarguments presented — Noem's claim that Trump approved the ads is noted, but her fuller response is not included.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article shifts from recounting events to advocating a political interpretation.
- Source diversity — The article relies primarily on Kennedy's account and adds no independent or opposing sources.
The piece strongly favors Trump and Kennedy while criticizing Noem and Democrats. Its approval of Trump's response and its partisan language about Democrats make the right-leaning framing pronounced.
- Language tone — Uses approving and dismissive language, including praise for Trump and criticism of Democrats.
- Framing — Frames Trump's response as responsible action and the episode as evidence of a contrast with Democrats.
- Source selection — Relies on Kennedy's account and does not include a response from Noem or a contrasting perspective.
- Headline — The headline emphasizes Kennedy's account and distinctive style.
After Sen. John Kennedy questioned Kristi Noem about a costly DHS ad campaign, he told Fox host Will Cain that President Trump later called him and denied approving it. The article presents the episode as part of Noem’s removal and Trump’s choice of a replacement.
The article says Noem was removed as Homeland Security secretary after testifying before Congress. Kennedy questioned her about a $220 million ad campaign she had approved; she said Trump had approved it, while Kennedy said their accounts differed. He later told Fox host Will Cain that Trump called him after the hearing and said he had nothing to do with the campaign. Kennedy also described the ads as resembling political ads featuring Noem prominently.
The article reports that Trump moved Noem to a special envoy role and named Sen. Markwayne Mullin as her replacement. It praises Trump for addressing concerns in his administration and argues that the focus should be on deportations and national security. It also criticizes Democrats over a DHS shutdown and says ICE has funding from the One Big Beautiful bill.
Community verdict
12 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Former Homeland Security secretary whose ad campaign and testimony were questioned
Louisiana senator who questioned Noem and recounted Trump's response
Kennedy's version of this story ↗President who reportedly denied approving the ads and removed Noem
Trump's version of this story ↗Former president cited in a comparison about border security
Senator named as Noem's replacement at DHS
Part of a bigger story
6 OUTLETSSen. John Kennedy questioned Kristi Noem at a Senate hearing about a $220 million DHS ad campaign. President Trump later said he had not approved the spending, and Noem left the department for another government role. Center outlets connect the hearing and conflicting accounts about Trump’s approval to Noem’s departure. Right-leaning outlets foreground Kennedy’s account of Trump’s response and the departure that followed.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 6
- AVG CRED
- 64
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




