Elissa Slotkin, Other Dems Turn Up the TDS Meter at Markwayne Mullin's DHS Confirmation Hearing
Slotkin pressed Mullin on ICE practices, election security, and the potential presence of officers at polling locations.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is an opinion-oriented outlet, and this article is openly partisan in its framing. It identifies its author and includes hearing excerpts, but offers little independent sourcing or presentation of competing interpretations.
- Source type — Opinion outlet; a strong prior for advocacy-oriented framing.
- Editorial standards — The piece uses highly charged language and does not present a neutral account.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Source diversity — Hearing excerpts are included, but there is little independent verification or competing analysis.
The article supplies extended excerpts from the hearing, which lets readers see some of the exchange directly. Its analysis is strongly partisan, relies on selected excerpts and social-media posts, and does not meaningfully test or contextualize the competing claims.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Although the piece reproduces statements from both sides of the hearing, the author consistently mocks and criticizes the Democratic senators while endorsing Mullin’s responses. It does not fairly examine the concerns raised or provide meaningful countercontext.
- Loaded language — Frequent insults and pejorative labels are directed at the Democratic senators.
- Counterarguments presented — Democratic senators’ concerns appear in excerpts, but the author does not seriously engage with their reasoning.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly opinionated and repeatedly supplies the author’s verdict.
- Source diversity — The account offers little independent sourcing or broader context.
The article strongly favors Mullin and portrays Democratic senators, especially Slotkin, as deceptive and irrational. Its repeated partisan labels and dismissive language make the right-leaning framing unmistakable.
- Language tone — Uses insults and dismissive characterizations of Democratic senators and their questions.
- Framing — Frames the hearing as an attempted Democratic trap and presents Mullin as successfully resisting it.
- Source selection — Relies mainly on selected hearing excerpts and criticism of Democratic senators, with little independent context.
- Headline — The headline uses the partisan phrase “TDS Meter” to characterize the Democrats’ conduct.
RedState’s opinion article criticizes Democratic senators’ questioning of Markwayne Mullin at his Homeland Security confirmation hearing, focusing on Elissa Slotkin’s concerns about ICE and election security. Mullin said DHS would work within the law and that states control elections.
The article describes Slotkin questioning Mullin about ICE, election security, and whether DHS could place uniformed officers at polling locations. Mullin said he could not make laws, described a role for DHS officers only in response to a specific threat, and said states control state elections. The author characterizes the Democratic senators’ questions as attempts to promote a partisan narrative.
The article also recounts questions from Andy Kim and Ruben Gallego. It says Mullin raised the Save America Act during the exchange, while Gallego questioned the use of Homeland Security Investigations agents. The piece presents Mullin’s responses favorably and attacks the Democratic senators’ approach.
Community verdict
6 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Homeland Security secretary nominee questioned at a Senate confirmation hearing
Mullin's version of this story ↗Senator who questioned Mullin during the hearing
President discussed in Slotkin’s remarks about election security
Former president mentioned by Mullin when discussing the 2020 election
Former Homeland Security secretary mentioned in Slotkin’s remarks
Senator who questioned Mullin about election-related investigations
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSAt Markwayne Mullin’s DHS confirmation hearing, Slotkin questioned whether ICE agents could be sent to polling places and said she did not trust President Trump to allow a free and fair election. Right-leaning outlets mostly present Slotkin’s warnings as partisan Democratic opposition, while one article reports the exchange alongside arguments supporting ICE activity.
- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 50
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








