Skip to main content
1 min read
◆ Mixed look for JohnsonBudget / SpendingImmigration

'You are all frauds!' MAGA loses its mind as Mike Johnson surrenders on DHS funding

Johnson joined a statement supporting a Senate funding bill that would reopen DHS without ICE or Border Patrol funding.

'You are all frauds!' MAGA loses its mind as Mike Johnson surrenders on DHS funding
Image · Raw Story

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityRaw Story57/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026
Raw Story
Apr 1, 2026
tl;dr

House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune signaled support for a bipartisan Senate bill to reopen DHS without ICE or Border Patrol funding. The agreement drew objections from MAGA lawmakers and social media users.

Community verdict

23 VOTES
How does this story look for
Mike Johnson R · LA-4
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Mike Johnson
R · LA-4

House Speaker who agreed to support the DHS funding plan

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President cited by a social media user

John Thune
R · SD · SEN

Senate Majority Leader who joined Johnson in the joint statement

Keith Self
R · TX-3

Representative who opposed separating ICE and Customs and Border Protection funding from DHS funding

Scott Perry
R · PA-10

Representative who opposed separating border and ICE funding from DHS funding

Part of a bigger story

12 OUTLETS
Mike Johnson Delays House Vote on DHS Funding Bill

Outlets report that Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune backed a two-track plan to reopen most of DHS while pursuing separate funding for ICE and Border Patrol. The plan drew Republican objections and faced uncertainty over House action. Left-leaning outlets cast Johnson’s shift as capitulation and emphasize backlash from MAGA-aligned critics. Center outlets focus on hurdles and party divisions around the plan, as well as Johnson’s delayed House vote. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Republican anger over his reversal, though one presents the agreement as a strategic win for Republicans.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…