'Weak, cowardly, unprincipled': Bill Cassidy hit by onslaught of fury after Blanche speech
Cassidy said he would vote to confirm Blanche after outlining concerns about his appointment as attorney general.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news outlet with named bylines, though its coverage can use a strongly partisan framing. The article identifies the subject and quotes named sources, but relies heavily on selected social-media reactions.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Source type — National news outlet; the article's sourcing is narrow and heavily based on online reactions.
- Transparency — The article attributes quoted criticism to named individuals and outlets.
- Editorial standards — An established news publisher, though the presentation here emphasizes reaction and conflict.
The article gives Cassidy’s stated rationale and quotes multiple critics, but most of its reporting is a collection of hostile reactions. It offers little independent context or response from Blanche and does not develop competing assessments of the nomination.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Cassidy’s explanation for his vote, but most of its space is devoted to criticism from commentators and social-media users. It provides little countervailing context about Blanche or the arguments supporting his confirmation.
- Source diversity — Several critics are quoted, but the range of perspectives is narrow.
- Counterarguments presented — Cassidy’s stated rationale appears, but supporting views on the nomination are largely absent.
- Loaded language — The headline and many quoted reactions use highly charged language.
The article’s framing foregrounds denunciations of Cassidy and includes a long sequence of sharply critical reactions, with limited space for his rationale. This gives the story a left-leaning presentation rather than a neutral account of competing responses.
- Source selection — The quoted reactions are overwhelmingly critical of Cassidy’s vote.
- Language tone — The headline and article emphasize insults and condemnations of Cassidy.
- Framing — The article is organized around the backlash rather than a broader account of the confirmation.
Bill Cassidy said he would cast the deciding vote to confirm Todd Blanche as attorney general, despite concerns he raised about Blanche. Critics responded with insults and accusations, while Cassidy said he expected criticism.
Cassidy said he would vote to confirm Blanche, President Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general. Cassidy raised concerns about Blanche in a Senate floor speech but argued that leaving an acting attorney general in place could risk the Justice Department’s progress on human trafficking. He said he would be criticized for his vote.
The article quotes several critics who called Cassidy cowardly or accused him of supporting a cover-up. It also reports that Cassidy and his staff had not met with survivors of Jeffrey Epstein before his speech, despite their repeated requests.
Community verdict
17 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator who said he would cast the deciding vote to confirm Todd Blanche
President Trump's pick for attorney general
Senator described by a quoted commentator as voting against Blanche's confirmation
President who selected Blanche for attorney general
Part of a bigger story
21 OUTLETSOutlets agree Bill Cassidy said he would support Todd Blanche’s confirmation as attorney general, a move described as likely to secure or clear a path to confirmation. Left-leaning outlets stress criticism of Cassidy’s vote and argue his stated case does not resolve concerns about Blanche or Trump’s influence over the Justice Department. Center outlets present Cassidy’s endorsement alongside his reservations about the proposed fund and tax agreement, and the opposition of Murkowski and Collins. Right-leaning outlets emphasize that Cassidy’s support could clear Blanche’s path to confirmation, with HotAir treating it as a sensible alternative to opposition.
- ARTICLES
- 23
- OUTLETS
- 21
- AVG CRED
- 65
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




