Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for PaulHealthcare

Trump crippled GOP's Fauci hearing with 'baseless' voiding of Biden pardons: lawyer

Rand Paul threatened consequences for Fauci’s refusal to answer and ordered Fauci’s attorney removed from the hearing.

Trump crippled GOP's Fauci hearing with 'baseless' voiding of Biden pardons: lawyer
Image · Raw Story

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityRaw Story55/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 2, 2026
Raw Story
Jul 29, 2026
tl;dr

Anthony Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment and answered no questions at a Senate hearing, prompting committee chairman Rand Paul to threaten repercussions and remove Fauci’s lawyer. A former prosecutor argued that Donald Trump’s efforts to void Joe Biden’s pardons gave Fauci grounds to claim he could still face prosecution.

Community verdict

9 VOTES
How does this story look for
Rand Paul R · KY · SEN
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Rand Paul
R · KY · SEN

Senate committee chairman who threatened repercussions for Fauci’s refusal to answer and had his attorney removed

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose efforts to invalidate Biden’s pardons were said to affect Fauci’s decision to invoke the Fifth Amendment

Trump's version of this story ↗

Former president whose pardons Trump said he sought to invalidate

ALSO MENTIONED  Anthony Fauci, Former NIAID director who appeared under subpoena and invoked the Fifth Amendment; Bill Shipley, Former prosecutor who argued that Trump’s pardon challenge gave Fauci grounds to invoke the Fifth Amendment; David Schertler, Fauci’s attorney, removed from the hearing after attempting to interject

Part of a bigger story

43 OUTLETS
Rand Paul Leads Senate Hearing Questioning Anthony Fauci

Rand Paul led a Senate hearing questioning Anthony Fauci, who repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer questions. Paul said the committee would vote on whether to hold Fauci in contempt. Left-leaning outlets portray the hearing as a partisan revival of pandemic disputes, with some focusing on the diary’s release or alleged editing. Center outlets emphasize the testimony, competing claims and planned contempt vote, with some noting limits to what the hearing established. Right-leaning outlets frame Fauci’s refusals as evasion and Paul’s actions as accountability, often highlighting the attorney’s removal.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…