'Such a coward': Ted Cruz's 'courage disappears' defending Trump's 9/11 claim: critics
Cruz said he had no doubt Trump was describing his experience, drawing criticism for his response.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established, politically progressive news outlet, but its framing and source type here provide less evidence of broad institutional standards than a major national newspaper or wire service. The article attributes its central fact-checking claims to PolitiFact and includes named critics.
- Source type — An established partisan outlet; its political perspective warrants some caution but does not by itself negate its reporting.
- Source diversity — It cites PolitiFact and CNN and names several critics, though the criticism of Cruz is not balanced by a response from him beyond the interview excerpt.
- Author attribution — The article names David Edwards as its author.
- Editorial standards — The supplied text does not establish the outlet's corrections practices or specific editorial safeguards.
The article gives direct quotations from Cruz and CNN's Kaitlan Collins and attributes key factual claims to PolitiFact. Its account of the backlash relies on critical reactions and offers little broader context or response beyond Cruz's interview remarks.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes the interview exchange and factual context challenging Trump's account, but its closing focus is on criticism of Cruz and it does not present responses from those critics' targets or a countervailing assessment.
- Counterarguments presented — Cruz's own explanation appears in the interview excerpt, but the article does not provide a fuller defense of his response.
- Source diversity — It draws on CNN and PolitiFact, while reactions to Cruz come from critics.
- Omitted context — The article provides little context from Cruz or Trump beyond the reported remarks.
- Loaded language — The headline foregrounds highly critical language from commenters.
The story's headline and selection of reactions emphasize criticism of Cruz's defense of Trump. Its factual account is attributed to PolitiFact and the CNN interview, but the article does not include supportive reactions to Cruz.
- Headline — The headline uses a critical phrase about Cruz and foregrounds critics' judgment.
- Source selection — The quoted reactions are critical of Cruz, with no quoted defense of his answer.
- Framing — The story frames Cruz's remarks as a defense of Trump's disputed account.
Sen. Ted Cruz defended President Donald Trump's account of being helped by firefighters at Ground Zero after 9/11, despite a fact-check finding no evidence that Trump was there. Cruz's response drew criticism from political figures and other commentators.
Trump said he was at the site after the 2001 attacks and that firefighters lifted him away from a nearby building they feared might collapse. PolitiFact found no accounts placing Trump at the scene, and reported that the earliest photo or video of him near Ground Zero was dated Sept. 13, 2001.
Asked about the account on CNN, Cruz said he had no doubt Trump was describing what he experienced, and framed the remarks as sharing feelings and sentiments. Gregg Nunziata, Joe Walsh and Norman Ornstein criticized Cruz's response.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose account of his presence at Ground Zero was defended by Cruz
Trump's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSOutlets agree Senator Ted Cruz defended Donald Trump's account of his experiences on September 11, 2001, despite fact-checkers finding no evidence to support Trump's claims. Left-leaning outlets emphasize sharp condemnation of Cruz for backing Trump's story, with Raw Story highlighting critics who denounced his response. Center outlets, represented by Attack of the Fanboy, focus on the lack of evidence for Trump's claims alongside Cruz's call to give the president the benefit of the doubt.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 52
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

