Megyn Kelly up in arms after MAGA pinch-hitter's 'disqualifying' debate disaster
Her debate answer about national security prompted criticism from Megyn Kelly and Tom Bevan.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story's publisher rating is 51 across 253 stories, which supports a middling assessment. The article attributes part of its account to The Daily Beast and names its author, but offers limited sourcing beyond quoted podcast remarks.
- Track record — The publisher's recorded rating is 51 based on 253 stories.
- Source type — Recorded as national news, though the article relies substantially on remarks from a podcast and a second outlet's account.
- Author attribution — A named author is provided.
The piece includes attributed quotations from the debate and podcast, but it is brief and largely presents criticism of Graham without her response to that criticism or much additional context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives Graham's debate remarks but devotes most of its attention to Kelly's and Bevan's negative reactions, with little additional context or response.
- Counterarguments presented — Graham's debate answer is quoted, but she does not respond to the criticism made afterward.
- Source diversity — The piece quotes Kelly and Bevan but provides little perspective beyond their criticism.
- Loaded language — The headline uses strongly critical wording.
The piece uses a critical frame and a loaded headline, but its criticism is directed at a debate performance rather than expressing a discernible broader political lean.
- Language tone — The headline calls the debate a disaster, while the article attributes its critical judgments to Kelly and Bevan.
- Source selection — The article mainly features critical commentary and does not include a response from Graham to that commentary.
Megyn Kelly criticized Sen. Darline Graham’s debate answers on national security, calling them disqualifying. Graham said she was not informed on the subject but supported the military.
Raw Story reports that Kelly criticized Graham’s debate performance on her podcast. Graham said she was “not that informed on national security” but supported the military; the audience booed during the debate in her hometown of Newberry.
Kelly called Graham’s answer disqualifying and said she was mortified. Guest Tom Bevan also criticized Graham’s knowledge of foreign policy. The article says President Trump had endorsed Graham and asked her to take her late brother Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat.
Community verdict
3 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose national security answers at a debate drew criticism
Darline Graham's late brother and former senator
President who endorsed Darline Graham and asked her to take her brother's Senate seat
Part of a bigger story
11 OUTLETSOutlets agree that during a South Carolina Republican Senate runoff debate, Darline Graham said she was not well informed on national security or that it was not her area of expertise. The remark drew scrutiny as she seeks a full Senate term. Left-leaning outlets link the remark to wider criticism of Graham’s debate performance and the politics around Trump’s support. Center outlets focus on the national-security answer and the criticism it drew. Right-leaning outlets likewise report the remark and reactions, with one emphasizing Graham’s stated focus on domestic concerns.
- ARTICLES
- 11
- OUTLETS
- 11
- AVG CRED
- 63
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


