Kristi Noem pitches fit after being trashed on '60 Minutes': 'I was effective'
Noem defended her DHS record on X and criticized Tillis after his comments in a television interview.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news outlet with named authors and attribution, but its partisan orientation and the article’s reliance on an interview and social-media posts limit confidence in its institutional neutrality and original verification.
- Source type — An established national digital news outlet, though known for a left-leaning perspective.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes key claims to speakers, but its framing uses loaded language.
- Author attribution — A named author is listed.
- Track record — The outlet has a sustained record of publishing political news, but this brief piece offers little independent corroboration.
The story identifies the sources of the comments and includes both Tillis’s criticism and Noem’s response. It does not independently substantiate Noem’s savings figures or provide further context, and its framing is noticeably loaded.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents Tillis’s criticism alongside Noem’s lengthy reply, but offers no independent verification of her claims and uses framing that favors the critical account.
- Loaded language — The opening and narration characterize Noem’s reaction in disparaging terms.
- Omitted context — Noem’s taxpayer-savings claims are reported without verification or supporting evidence.
- Counterarguments presented — Noem’s response to Tillis is quoted at length.
- Source diversity — The story draws on Tillis’s interview, Noem’s X posts, and brief reactions from critics, but no independent expert or official source.
The report frames Noem’s reaction negatively with phrases such as “angrily lashed out” and notes that the clip did not make her look good. It nevertheless quotes both Tillis’s criticism and Noem’s defense.
- Language tone — Uses loaded descriptions of Noem’s reaction and presentation.
- Framing — Centers Tillis’s criticism and presents Noem’s response as a reaction to it.
- Source selection — Includes Tillis, Noem, and brief responses from her critics on X.
After Sen. Thom Tillis criticized Kristi Noem’s tenure at the Department of Homeland Security in a “60 Minutes” interview, Noem defended her immigration-enforcement record and taxpayer-savings claims on X, and took aim at Tillis over his retirement.
In a “60 Minutes” interview, Tillis criticized a $200 million DHS ad campaign featuring Noem and her characterization of people who were shot as potential domestic terrorists. He also questioned why President Donald Trump chose Noem and said she and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth should not have been given their authority.
Noem responded on X that she had enforced immigration laws and claimed voluntary departures saved taxpayers $40 billion. She also said she saved $15 billion by cutting contracts, and told Tillis his retirement was overdue. The article reports that several of Noem’s critics on X agreed with Tillis.
Community verdict
11 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Former Homeland Security secretary who responded to Tillis
Senator whose interview criticism prompted Noem’s response
Tillis's version of this story ↗President referenced in Tillis’s comments and Noem’s response
Defense secretary whom Tillis criticized alongside Noem
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



