GOP senators rip Trump's 'bad form' splurge with swipe at Kristi Noem: report
The article reports that Trump championed the ads and was personally involved in the effort.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news outlet, but this short report relies substantially on another outlet’s reporting and does not show the same level of sourcing or transparency as a newspaper of record. The named author and attributed quotations provide some accountability.
- Source type — An established digital news outlet, though not a newspaper of record.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes key reporting to The Bulwark and includes direct quotations, but the short text offers limited independent documentation.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Transparency — The underlying report and its author are identified, while the article provides limited detail on independent verification.
The article names its underlying reporting source and gives direct quotations from senators across both parties. It offers little documentary detail and does not include a response from the administration or an explanation of the funding and legal questions.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes comments from both Republican and Democratic senators, including a Republican who said he had not seen the ads. It does not provide a response from Trump’s administration or detail its rationale for the advertising.
- Source diversity — Senators from both parties are quoted, though the article offers no administration perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — Lankford notes that government commercials are routine, but no direct defense of these ads is included.
- Omitted context — The funding source, legal basis, and administration’s reasoning remain unsubstantiated in the article.
The report uses mildly critical framing around Trump’s self-promotional ads but largely presents attributed remarks from senators rather than making an explicit argument.
- Language tone — Terms such as “glorifying himself” and “self-aggrandizing” frame the ads critically, with attribution for the latter.
- Source selection — The article quotes Republican and Democratic senators, but no administration representative.
- Framing — The report is organized around lawmakers’ criticism and questions about the ads.
Republican and Democratic senators criticized or questioned government-funded ads featuring Donald Trump, with John Cornyn calling them “bad form” and suggesting the money may have come from Kristi Noem’s earlier videos. Some senators are seeking details about the ads’ production and approval.
A report by The Bulwark’s Joe Perticone described pushback from Republican senators over government-funded ads airing during NFL games. The ads feature Trump promising to “demolish the deep state” and “rout the fake news media.” Cornyn said the president was not permitted to run them and suggested leftover funds from Noem’s videos might be involved; Mike Rounds said he would not do the same and raised questions about whether the ads were lawful. James Lankford said he had not seen them and noted that the government regularly airs commercials.
Democratic senators also criticized the ads. Gary Peters said they served a political purpose and diverted funds from border security and homeland protection. Chris Murphy and Patty Murray wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin seeking information about how the ads were made, Trump’s role, and whether ethics officials approved them. Perticone reported that Trump had championed the effort and been personally involved.
Community verdict
11 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose voice and image appear in the government-funded ads
Senator criticizing the government-funded Trump ads
Cornyn's version of this story ↗Senator who joined a request for information about the ads
Senator who joined a request for information about the ads
Senator expressing reservations about the ads
Former Homeland Security secretary referenced in Cornyn’s suggestion about the ads’ funding
Senator commenting on government advertising
Homeland Security secretary who received the senators’ letter
Senator criticizing the ads and their funding
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSLawmakers have questioned the use of federal money for television ads featuring Trump, which the White House describes as public-service announcements. Left-leaning outlets focus on demands for watchdog investigations into whether public money was used unlawfully for political messaging. Center outlets pair funding questions with the White House’s public-service rationale, while one column broadens the issue to taxpayer-funded political promotion across parties.
- ARTICLES
- 9
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 74
- TPM – Talking Points Memo · Calls for Investigations Into Trump’s Narcissistic Midterm Ads Pile Up
- WTOP News · Maryland lawmaker seeks federal probe into taxpayer funding of Trump TV spots - WTOP News
- HuffPost · Raskin Demands Investigation Into Trump's 'Shameless Theft Of Public Funds' For Campaign Ads
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…









