GOP candidate's damning slip adds fuel to spiraling forced child marriage scandal
Biggs defended his opposition to a bill addressing forced child marriage and was questioned about what he knew at the time.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe publisher's recorded rating is 51, which is the strongest available site-specific signal. The article identifies its author and attributes much of its background reporting to other outlets, but the page provides limited detail about corrections practices or original sourcing.
- Track record — The publisher's recorded credibility rating is 51 based on 253 stories.
- Source type — Recorded as national news, though much of the background is attributed to other publications.
- Author attribution — A named author is listed.
- Transparency — The page names sources for several claims but gives little visible information about corrections practices.
The article includes Biggs's remarks, his campaign adviser's explanation, and criticism from the bill's sponsor and a survivor. Much of the historical context is attributed to other outlets, and the article offers limited independent documentation or detail about the bill.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Biggs's statements and his campaign adviser's rationale alongside critics' accounts and the bill's history. The critical framing is prominent, and the article offers little detail directly from the bill's supporters or independent documentation.
- Counterarguments presented — Biggs's comments and his adviser's explanation of his opposition are included.
- Source diversity — The story includes the bill's sponsor, a survivor's statement, Biggs, and a campaign adviser, while relying on other outlets for background.
- Loaded language — The headline uses “damning” and “scandal,” giving the story a critical frame.
- Omitted context — The article provides limited detail about the bill's provisions beyond the stated purpose and the adviser's claim that it was too broad.
The article's headline and framing emphasize damaging implications for Biggs, and the account features critical statements about his role. It also includes his prior explanation and his campaign adviser's defense.
- Headline — The headline calls Biggs's remarks a “damning slip” and describes a spiraling scandal.
- Framing — The story foregrounds accusations that Biggs's opposition prolonged harm to women and children.
- Source selection — Critics and a survivor are quoted, while Biggs's defense is represented through his own remarks and a campaign adviser's explanation.
At a public-safety forum, Arizona gubernatorial nominee Andy Biggs said he knew about forced underage marriages while defending his opposition to a 2013 state bill. Critics say his opposition helped block the measure, while his campaign adviser says the bill was too broad.
Biggs, a U.S. representative and Republican nominee for Arizona governor, was questioned at a 2026 public-safety forum about a 2013 bill intended to remove authority from the Colorado City Marshal’s Office. Asked whether he knew what was happening, Biggs said, “I was the Senate president. I knew what was going on,” and said officials had heard “bits and pieces” while federal authorities investigated. He had previously said officials were still gathering information, according to the Washington Post.
The article reports that the bill passed the Arizona House 52-7 but died in the state Senate without a vote. Former state representative Michelle Ugenti-Rita, who sponsored it, said women and children suffered longer because Biggs protected “the bad guys.” Biggs campaign adviser Drew Sexton said Biggs opposed the legislation because it was poorly written and too broad. A video released by Governor Katie Hobbs’ campaign also called on Biggs to explain his opposition.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
Arizona representative and gubernatorial nominee questioned over his opposition to a 2013 state bill
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
