'Bogus': Thom Tillis erupts at Trump for listening to 'incompetent personal advisor'
Trump defended Jan. 6 rioters and said he would consider withdrawing Blanche’s nomination amid the dispute over the fund.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news publisher, and this piece identifies its author and attributes statements to named figures and their social-media posts. The short article offers little independent reporting or context, limiting confidence in its broader institutional reliability for this story.
- Source type — Recorded as a national news publisher; an established outlet, though not a top-tier newspaper of record.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes key claims and quotations, but provides little independent verification or context.
- Transparency — The story identifies the source of the quoted statements as social-media posts.
The article clearly attributes the central statements to Tillis and Trump and gives the confirmation dispute some immediate context. It is brief and relies mainly on politicians’ posts and statements, without explaining the settlement’s terms, identifying the adviser, or offering a response from that person.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents Tillis’s criticism and Trump’s contrary characterization of Jan. 6 rioters, but does not explain the settlement’s terms or include a response from the unnamed adviser blamed by Tillis.
- Counterarguments presented — Trump’s defense of the rioters is included, providing a competing view on the central dispute.
- Source diversity — The account relies on statements by the politicians involved and includes no independent or outside source.
- Omitted context — The settlement’s terms and the adviser’s identity or response are not supplied.
- Loaded language — The headline uses emphatic wording, though the article attributes the strongest claims to the speakers.
The report centers Tillis’s criticism of Trump and uses an emphatic headline, while also including Trump’s defense of the Jan. 6 rioters. The framing leans somewhat critical of Trump but is not an overt argument.
- Headline — “Erupts” and the quoted word “bogus” make the headline more charged than a neutral description.
- Framing — The story is organized around Tillis’s rebuke of Trump and an unnamed adviser.
- Source selection — It includes statements from both Tillis and Trump, though most of the article quotes or paraphrases Tillis.
Sen. Thom Tillis criticized President Donald Trump’s defense of Jan. 6 rioters and blamed an unnamed Trump adviser for a disputed settlement that has stalled Todd Blanche’s attorney general confirmation. Tillis and Sen. John Cornyn say they will oppose confirmation unless Trump commits to ending the fund.
Tillis said he did not dispute that the Biden administration pursued what he called vindictive prosecutions related to Jan. 6, but argued that people who assaulted police officers should not be described as patriots or receive federal payments. He also blamed an unnamed adviser for the settlement dispute and said he would keep working to prevent a potential misuse of taxpayer money.
Earlier Friday, Trump criticized Cornyn, saying Jan. 6 rioters had been “hunted down like dogs.” Tillis and Cornyn had met with Blanche about the fund, and Trump said he would consider withdrawing Blanche’s nomination. Tillis and Cornyn are demanding that Trump commit to ending the fund or they will oppose Blanche’s confirmation.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose statements and possible withdrawal of Blanche’s nomination prompted Tillis’s criticism
Senator criticizing Trump’s position on Jan. 6 rioters and the disputed fund
Tillis's version of this story ↗Acting attorney general and nominee whose confirmation is threatened
Senator joining Tillis in demanding an end to the fund
Part of a bigger story
11 OUTLETSTrump defended the proposed $1.8 billion fund as Sens. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis sought assurances before supporting Todd Blanche’s confirmation as attorney general. Left-leaning outlets center Tillis’s criticism of Trump, with one article presenting the fund as an effort to benefit Trump’s allies. Center outlets mostly connect Trump’s defense of the fund to senators’ demands for assurances, while one article stresses payments to Jan. 6 rioters. Right-leaning outlets pair Trump’s defense of the fund with his backing of Blanche and the senators’ requests for assurances.
- ARTICLES
- 12
- OUTLETS
- 11
- AVG CRED
- 71
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



