Platner Voter Fine With His Nazi Tattoo, But Says Israeli Flag Would Be 'Dealbreaker' – PJ Media
The article criticizes a supporter’s defense of Platner and revisits claims about his tattoo, views and conduct.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYPJ Media is identified as an opinion publisher, and this piece uses strongly partisan framing rather than a neutral reporting approach. The author is named, but several serious claims are repeated without a response from Platner or supporting documentation in the article.
- Source type — Opinion outlet; a strong prior for advocacy-oriented framing.
- Source diversity — Includes a video quotation and a commentator’s statement, but little independent sourcing.
- Author attribution — A named author is provided.
- Editorial standards — The article uses highly charged assertions and does not include a response from Platner.
The article presents a voter’s remarks and attributes some claims, but relies heavily on polemical characterization and repeats serious allegations without giving Platner’s response or showing corroborating evidence.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article is an openly one-sided opinion piece that condemns Platner and the voter, without presenting their fuller responses or counterarguments.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive counterargument or response from Platner is included.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses insults and emotionally charged descriptions.
- Opinion vs reporting — The author’s judgments are central to the piece.
- Source diversity — Uses a quoted voter and a commentator but offers little range of perspectives.
The piece uses explicitly conservative and strongly anti-Platner framing, calling him a neo-Nazi and describing his views and conduct in condemnatory terms. Its presentation is not politically neutral.
- Language tone — Uses insults and highly charged descriptions of Platner and his supporter.
- Framing — Frames the voter’s remarks as proof of ideological hypocrisy and links Platner to neo-Nazi ideology.
- Source selection — Relies on a social-media clip and a commentator while presenting no opposing response.
PJ Media criticizes a Maine Senate candidate’s supporter after a video showed her saying his Nazi-associated tattoo would not deter her, while an Israeli flag tattoo would. The article also revisits claims about Graham Platner’s views and past conduct.
The article quotes a voter at a rally defending Graham Platner over a tattoo she says people are making too much of, then saying an Israeli flag tattoo would be a dealbreaker because she believes it would be inconsistent with his opposition to genocide. PJ Media presents the contrast as evidence of the supporter’s double standard and sharply criticizes Platner’s views.
The author also cites a commentator’s claim about the history of Platner’s tattoo and recounts allegations from women who dated him, including claims of emotional abuse and physical intimidation. These are presented as claims and allegations, not independently established findings in the article.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSED
No good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Platner in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Platner’s record.
People in this story
Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in Maine, discussed through a supporter’s comments about his tattoo and views.
Part of a bigger story
27 OUTLETSGraham Platner, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Maine, faced scrutiny over reports about his past conduct during his campaign. Left-leaning outlets focus on questions about his political viability and defenses made on his behalf. Center outlets emphasize Democratic responses, voter views and the race’s stakes. Right-leaning outlets more often present the allegations as evidence against Platner and criticize Democrats who continue to support him, though some also report voter backing.
- ARTICLES
- 38
- OUTLETS
- 27
- AVG CRED
- 57
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…