A Tough Ad Reminds Nebraska Voters About a Brutal Crime and a Pardon
A political ad criticizes Ricketts for voting to pardon a man convicted of sexual assault, a decision he later defended.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Times is an established national newspaper with substantial editorial resources and a record of original reporting. The article is bylined and distinguishes the ad’s claims from details checked against state records and hearing audio.
- Track record — Established national newspaper with a long record of original reporting.
- Editorial standards — A major newsroom with formal editing and fact-checking processes.
- Author attribution — The article names Lisa Lerer as its author.
- Transparency — The article identifies state records and pardon-hearing audio as sources for its account.
The article checks the political ad against state records and a hearing recording, and includes Ricketts’s defense and the opposing view of another pardon-board member. It could provide more direct contemporary response from Ricketts, but it offers substantial detail and attribution.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article tests the ad’s assertions and gives context for the pardon, including Ricketts’s defense and the views of other board members. The story remains centered on the ad and the victim’s account, with limited direct response from Ricketts beyond his earlier statement.
- Counterarguments presented — Reports Ricketts’s defense of the decision and the reasoning offered by board members who voted for and against it.
- Source diversity — Draws on an ad, state records, hearing audio and statements by pardon-board members.
- Omitted context — Does not report a new direct response from Ricketts to the ad.
- Loaded language — Most descriptions are factual or clearly attributed to the ad’s narrator.
The article describes the ad’s framing but also checks its claims against records and presents the pardon-board members’ differing views and Ricketts’s defense. Its language is predominantly reportorial rather than partisan.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral descriptions of the ad and the pardon decision.
- Source selection — Uses hearing audio and state records, and includes statements from officials on both sides of the pardon decision.
- Framing — Frames the story as an examination of the ad’s accuracy and takeaway.
A super PAC supporting Dan Osborn is airing an ad attacking Senator Pete Ricketts for voting to pardon a man convicted of sexual assault. The article examines the ad’s claims and reports that Ricketts defended the pardon by citing the man’s remorse.
A super PAC backing Nebraska Senate candidate Dan Osborn is running a graphic ad criticizing Senator Pete Ricketts for voting in 2022 to pardon John Arias, who had pleaded guilty to first-degree sexual assault. The article checks the ad’s account against state records and a recording of Arias’s pardon hearing.
Community verdict
18 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Nebraska senator criticized for voting to pardon a man convicted of sexual assault
Nebraska Senate candidate backed by the group airing the ad
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

