Skip to main content
5 min read
◆ Mixed look for HeinrichBudget / SpendingImmigration

Democrats Who Voted With Republicans to Confirm Markwayne Mullin

Heinrich supported Mullin despite his past opposition to DHS policies, citing their working relationship and New Mexico’s border terrain.

Democrats Who Voted With Republicans to Confirm Markwayne Mullin
Image · Newsweek

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityNewsweek75/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026
Newsweek
Mar 23, 2026
tl;dr

The Senate confirmed Markwayne Mullin as homeland security secretary in a 54-45 vote, with Democratic Senators John Fetterman and Martin Heinrich supporting him and Republican Rand Paul opposing him. The article links the confirmation to disputes over immigration enforcement and a lapse in DHS funding.

Community verdict

42 VOTES
How does this story look for
Martin Heinrich D · NM · SEN
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Martin Heinrich
D · NM · SEN

Senator who voted to confirm Mullin

PRIMARY SUBJECT
John Fetterman
D · PA · SEN

Senator who voted to confirm Mullin

Fetterman's version of this story ↗
Jacky Rosen
D · NV · SEN

Senator who opposed Mullin’s nomination

Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who nominated Mullin

Kristi Noem
Former U.S. Representative (R-SD)

Former secretary of Homeland Security

Rand Paul
R · KY · SEN

Senator who opposed Mullin’s nomination

Ruben Gallego
D · AZ · SEN

Senator who did not vote on Mullin’s nomination

ALSO MENTIONED  Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma governor who congratulated Mullin

Part of a bigger story

7 OUTLETS
Martin Heinrich Supports Markwayne Mullin for DHS Secretary

Martin Heinrich backed Markwayne Mullin to lead the Department of Homeland Security, citing their working relationship. Center outlets explain the support through that relationship, with one also noting the New Mexico delegation split. Other coverage diverges: one article presents the vote as bipartisan cooperation and an administration win, while another casts it as betrayal or gullibility.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…