Graham Platner: Collins Is Either a Liar or a 'Fool'
Platner is using Collins’s 2018 vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh as an argument against her Senate candidacy.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYNewser is an established news-curation publisher, but this short article relies on reporting attributed to other outlets rather than presenting substantial original reporting. Its attribution and editorial presentation support a moderate assessment.
- Source type — A news-curation publisher; the article summarizes political reporting and cites other outlets.
- Editorial standards — The article is clearly written and distinguishes allegations from denials, but offers limited independent evidence.
- Transparency — The story identifies NBC News and the New York Times as sources for reported information.
The article attributes key information to named outlets, includes Collins’s position and Platner’s denial of allegations, and provides some competing context. Its brevity and reliance on summarized claims leave limited room for evidence or fuller responses.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece includes Collins’s defense of her vote and Platner’s denial of allegations, along with his allies’ response. It gives limited detail on Collins’s current position or the evidence behind the allegations.
- Counterarguments presented — Collins defends her vote, and Platner denies the allegations against him.
- Source diversity — The story presents claims and responses but relies mainly on summarized reporting and campaign perspectives.
- Omitted context — It gives little detail about the underlying allegations or Collins’s explanation of her vote.
The article reports a campaign attack and the surrounding allegations in mostly neutral language, with relevant responses and attribution. It does not clearly endorse either candidate’s position.
- Language tone — Mostly restrained reporting, with the sharp characterization attributed to Platner.
- Source selection — Includes Collins’s response and Platner’s denial, alongside reporting attributed to other outlets.
- Framing — Frames the Kavanaugh vote as a campaign issue without explicitly endorsing either side.
Graham Platner is making Sen. Susan Collins’s 2018 vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh central to his challenge, accusing her of breaking a promise on Roe. Collins says she was disappointed by Kavanaugh’s abortion ruling but still believes she cast the right vote.
Graham Platner, the Democrat who won the primary to challenge Susan Collins, is making her 2018 vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh a focus of his campaign. He accuses Collins of breaking a promise to protect Roe and calls her either a liar or a “fool.” Collins has said she was disappointed by Kavanaugh’s abortion ruling but maintains she “cast the right vote.”
The article also reports allegations by Platner’s former girlfriend that he was physically threatening; Platner denies them. His allies point to her conservative activism and past attacks on Kavanaugh’s accusers. Collins has called the allegations “extremely troubling,” and a Democratic super PAC is expected to run abortion-focused ads tying Collins to the fall of Roe.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Collins in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Collins’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator targeted by Platner over her Kavanaugh confirmation vote
Democratic Senate candidate challenging Susan Collins
Platner's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSGraham Platner criticized Susan Collins's record, and Collins rejected his characterization and defended her record. Left-leaning outlets portray the criticism of Platner as a Republican attack and Collins as hypocritical. Center outlets focus on the dispute over Collins's record and her voting alignment with Trump. Right-leaning outlets foreground Collins's defense of her record and work for Maine, while stressing Platner's controversies and rhetoric.
- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 71
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

