Skip to main content
3 min read
◆ Mixed look for PlatnerElections / Campaigns

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner stands by ad slamming Red Sox over private equity

Platner used a pulled Red Sox ad to promote his criticism of private equity as he campaigns for the Senate.

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner stands by ad slamming Red Sox over private equity
Image · Newsday

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityNewsday82/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 6, 2026

Credibility rates Newsday, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.

Original publisher not identified

This article credits another publisher, which ChamberLight has not identified, so the scores are Newsday's own.

Newsdayoriginal publisher not identified
May 26, 2026
tl;dr

Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner released an ad criticizing the Red Sox’ ownership and private equity, then criticized the station after it pulled the ad. The episode became part of his campaign against Sen. Susan Collins.

Community verdict

6 VOTES
How does this story look for
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →

Maine Senate candidate who released and defended an ad criticizing Red Sox ownership and private equity

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Susan M. Collins
R · ME · SEN

Maine senator and Platner’s opponent in the campaign

Jon Henry
R · TN

Red Sox and Fenway Sports Group owner; former political donor

Part of a bigger story

22 OUTLETS
NESN Removes Graham Platner Campaign Ad Criticizing Red Sox Ownership

Outlets agree NESN pulled Platner’s campaign ad criticizing Red Sox ownership and private equity during a game, citing an intellectual-property issue. Left-leaning outlets highlight questions about the removal, while a separate article endorses Platner over Susan Collins. Center outlets pair NESN’s explanation with Platner’s response and describe his use of the episode in his campaign. Right-leaning outlets often place the ad episode alongside scrutiny of Platner’s past posts or tattoo, including Dave Portnoy’s criticism.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…