Trump threatens to keep Todd Blanche as AG
Tillis’s opposition to Blanche’s confirmation helped force cancellation of a planned Judiciary Committee vote.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is an established national news outlet with identifiable reporters and a record of original reporting. Its tabloid presentation and partisan reputation warrant some caution, but the article attributes key statements to named speakers and their public remarks.
- Source type — Established national news outlet; a strong but not top-tier credibility prior.
- Author attribution — Two named reporters are credited.
- Editorial standards — Professional newsroom, though its presentation is often tabloid-style and politically partisan.
- Transparency — Key statements are attributed to Trump and Cornyn, with limited explanation of reporting methods.
The article includes direct statements from Trump and Cornyn and identifies the confirmation dispute and settlement at issue. It provides limited sourcing for some claims, offers no direct comment from Tillis, and gives little broader context about the fund or the settlement.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents Trump’s position and Cornyn’s explanation for opposing Blanche’s confirmation, and describes the disputed fund and settlement. It offers less of Tillis’s perspective and little response from those supporting the confirmation.
- Counterarguments presented — Cornyn’s stated accountability rationale appears alongside Trump’s criticism and support for Blanche.
- Source diversity — Trump and Cornyn are quoted; Tillis and other stakeholders are not directly heard.
- Omitted context — The fund and settlement receive limited explanation beyond the article’s account of the dispute.
- Loaded language — Most charged language is attributed to quoted speakers or critics.
The report largely presents the dispute through attributed statements and factual description. Its word choices do not establish a clear partisan lean, though the selection of details gives substantial space to the controversy around Blanche and the settlement.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral reporting language; charged terms are quoted or attributed.
- Source selection — Includes statements from Trump and Cornyn, but no direct statement from Tillis or supporters of Blanche’s confirmation.
- Framing — Centers on the confirmation dispute and the fund, while also describing the IRS settlement.
President Donald Trump said he would keep Todd Blanche as acting attorney general if senators do not confirm him and promised to revive an anti-weaponization bill, amid John Cornyn and Thom Tillis’s opposition over the fund and Blanche’s IRS settlement.
Trump said he would keep Blanche as acting attorney general if the Senate does not confirm his nomination, and said he would push to pass an anti-weaponization bill. Cornyn and Tillis have been holding up the confirmation; Trump cited his endorsement of Cornyn’s primary opponent as part of the dispute.
Cornyn has sought written confirmation of Blanche’s hearing testimony that the weaponization fund is dead, while saying Blanche negotiated in good faith. The article also reports that an immunity deal Blanche signed as acting attorney general remains in effect, and quotes Cornyn saying the settlement gives Trump protections ordinary citizens would not receive.
Community verdict
11 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President threatening to keep Blanche as acting attorney general and revive the anti-weaponization bill
Trump's version of this story ↗Acting attorney general whose confirmation is being held up
Blanche's version of this story ↗Senate Judiciary Committee chairman
Former attorney general
Former president, referred to in Trump’s criticism of the prior administration
Texas attorney general and Cornyn’s primary opponent
Part of a bigger story
36 OUTLETSOutlets agree Senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn withheld support for attorney general nominee Todd Blanche, demanding the Justice Department rescind a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund and clarify a tax settlement. Left-leaning outlets view the fund as a corrupt measure benefiting Donald Trump and question whether Blanche's concessions will hold. Center outlets focus on the committee standoff and the procedural negotiations that led Blanche to rescind the fund. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Trump's sharp clash with the senators and the political maneuvering over the nomination.
- ARTICLES
- 46
- OUTLETS
- 36
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






