Susan Collins breaks the internet with quip about Dem challenger Troy Jackson's romance with his second cousin
Collins’s remark about her challenger’s relationship went viral, and she also criticized his record in Maine politics.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is an established national outlet with an identifiable author, but its tabloid style and campaign-focused framing warrant a moderate rather than top-tier score. The article attributes key claims and quotes, though it offers limited independent context.
- Source type — Established national outlet, with a tabloid-oriented presentation.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The story attributes remarks and allegations, but provides limited independent verification or context.
- Transparency — The article identifies its sources for the quoted remarks and says Jackson’s campaign was contacted.
The article includes direct quotations and attributes criticisms to Collins, and it notes that Jackson’s campaign was contacted. However, much of the piece relies on campaign claims and social-media reactions, with little independent examination of the allegations or energy-policy dispute.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story includes Collins’s criticisms and favorable commentary about her, as well as Jackson’s polling lead and an indication that his campaign was contacted. It does not include a response from Jackson or much independent context for the accusations and policy claims.
- Counterarguments presented — Jackson’s campaign was contacted, but its response is not included.
- Source diversity — The piece quotes several commentators but centers its political claims on Collins’s account.
- Omitted context — The allegations and energy-rate criticism receive little independent context or corroboration in the article.
- Loaded language — The headline and some descriptions use vivid, promotional language about Collins’s remark.
The story’s headline, wording, and selection of commentary emphasize Collins’s political effectiveness while foregrounding damaging information about Jackson. Although it includes Jackson’s polling lead, the overall framing favors Collins.
- Headline — The headline presents Collins’s remark as a viral political success.
- Framing — The article describes Collins as a formidable combatant and recounts several favorable reactions to her quip.
- Source selection — The quoted campaign criticism comes primarily from Collins; Jackson’s campaign is said to have been contacted, but no response appears.
Susan Collins drew attention with a quip about Senate candidate Troy Jackson’s relationship with his second cousin. She also criticized Jackson’s political record, while the article notes he leads her in the latest polling average.
Collins told Politico columnist Jonathan Martin she would not emphasize that Jackson’s longtime partner is his second cousin, then remarked that people could decide whether the relationship would become a campaign issue. The exchange went viral, and several political commentators praised Collins’s political skill.
Collins criticized Jackson’s record in Maine state politics, including his role in energy costs and opposition to a bill she said could have lowered rates. The article also reports allegations about Jackson’s past conduct and says his campaign was contacted for comment. It notes that Jackson leads Collins by 2.3 percentage points in the latest RealClearPolitics polling aggregate.
Community verdict
13 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Incumbent senator and subject of the viral campaign exchange
Democratic Senate candidate criticized by Collins
Jackson's version of this story ↗Former Democratic nominee discussed as Jackson’s predecessor and a potential opponent
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSOutlets report that Senator Susan Collins drew widespread attention after remarking on reports that Democratic challenger Troy Jackson had children with his second cousin. Right-leaning outlets present Collins's remark as a sharp viral moment, with Fox News emphasizing conservative praise for the exchange alongside broader scrutiny of Jackson.
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


