Rep. Ilhan Omar gets 'community noted' on X for spreading misinformation about Iraq War
Omar’s post about the timing and motive of U.S. actions in Iraq drew a community note and criticism.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is an established national news organization with identifiable authors, but its tabloid style and reputation for partisan framing warrant a middle-range institutional score.
- Source type — An established national news publisher, though its tabloid format calls for caution.
- Editorial standards — The presentation uses highly charged language and shows limited separation between reporting and judgment.
- Author attribution — The article names its author.
- Transparency — The article identifies quoted speakers, but gives little sourcing detail for its reference to users’ corrections.
The article provides specific dates to support its central correction and identifies the source of one critical quote. But it relies on an unnamed reference to users, quotes a political opponent, offers no response from Omar, and uses loaded language.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives dates that challenge Omar’s claim, but its account is overwhelmingly critical, includes an opponent’s accusation, and does not provide Omar’s response or other context for her post.
- Counterarguments presented — The factual date correction is presented, but Omar’s explanation or response is absent.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses pejorative descriptions of Omar and her statements.
- Source diversity — Relies on the article’s account of dates and a quote from Omar’s electoral opponent.
- Omitted context — Does not explain the basis for Omar’s broader claim about U.S. actions or include her response to the correction.
The article’s language and framing are strongly critical of Omar, characterizing her post as an attempt to diss America and using dismissive descriptions of her statements.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “screeched,” “smug,” and “raged” to disparage Omar.
- Framing — Presents the post as a failed attack on America and frames the date correction as evidence of a broader pattern.
- Source selection — Includes a political opponent’s accusation but no response from Omar.
Rep. Ilhan Omar’s post claiming the U.S. attacked Iraq during Ramadan was challenged over the dates of the Iraq invasion and Operation Desert Storm. A Republican running against Omar accused her of deliberately spreading a false claim.
Omar wrote on X that the U.S. had attacked Iraq during Ramadan and argued that U.S. strikes on Muslim countries reflected hostility toward Muslims. The article says the 2003 invasion began seven months before Ramadan that year and Operation Desert Storm began two months before Ramadan in 1991. It describes the post as drawing a community note as a possible U.S. strike on Iran loomed.
Dalia Al-Aqidi, a Muslim Iraqi-American running against Omar for her House seat, called Omar’s claim a deliberate lie intended to inflame anger and divide Americans.
Community verdict
4 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →U.S. representative from Minnesota whose post about U.S. actions during Ramadan was challenged
Republican House candidate challenging Omar
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSIlhan Omar criticized U.S. strikes on Iran and said the United States strikes Muslim countries during Ramadan; her comparison with earlier Iraq attacks was challenged over the dates. Center outlets focus on scrutiny of Omar's Iran-related statements, including a senator's objection to sharing advance operation details with her and a report challenging her Iraq-date claim. Right-leaning outlets foreground the challenge to her Iraq-date claim and political rebukes of her comments about strikes during Ramadan.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 61
- Daily Mail · Democrat Congresswoman Ilhan Omar makes HUGE mistake while blasting Trump for attacking Iran
- New York Post · Nancy Mace bashes Ilhan Omar over Iran attack after 'Squad' rep claims US 'loves to strike Muslim countries during Ramadan'
- Mediaite · Markwayne Mullin: Ilhan Omar Can't Be Trusted With Iran Info
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
