Ill. Senate candidate Raja Krishnamoorthi slammed for $13 water while preaching 'affordability'
His campaign’s election-night party charged nearly $13 for water while he campaigned on affordability.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates New York Post, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The page credits Fox News, an established national outlet, for the reporting, though the article's strongly critical framing and limited range of sources warrant a moderate assessment.
- Source type — An established national news organization is credited with the reporting.
- Author attribution — The article identifies Fox News as the authoring outlet.
- Source selection — Several reactions are quoted, but the piece relies heavily on social-media criticism and does not include a campaign response.
The story provides specific prices, campaign fundraising figures and attributed reactions, and says the campaign was contacted. It offers little independent context or response to the criticism, leaving its central implication largely untested.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece supports its critical framing with multiple reactions and includes Krishnamoorthi’s affordability remarks, but does not provide his campaign’s response to the event-price criticism.
- Counterarguments presented — The story says the campaign was contacted but includes no response to the central criticism.
- Source diversity — The article quotes several commentators, but their remarks all reinforce the criticism.
- Loaded language — Words such as 'exorbitant' and 'irony' reinforce the critical framing.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as news but leans on ridicule and does not examine who set the venue prices.
The headline and article frame the prices as hypocrisy and emphasize ridicule directed at Krishnamoorthi. The piece includes no response from his campaign to the pricing criticism.
- Headline — The headline uses loaded wording, describing Krishnamoorthi as 'slammed' while 'preaching' affordability.
- Source selection — It quotes several people mocking the prices but provides no campaign response to that criticism.
- Framing — The story centers the contrast between costly event prices and his affordability message.
Republished with credit
Republished from Fox News, with credit to the original publisher.
1,662 stories · 69.0–69.5 · updated Oct 9, 2026
This is Fox News's own score, and this article is credited to Fox News. The host score in the Source Check is New York Post's.
Raja Krishnamoorthi’s Senate campaign faced online criticism after guests at its election-night party were charged nearly $13 for water, contrasting with his affordability message. The article also reports that he narrowly lost the Democratic primary to Juliana Stratton.
The article reports that Krishnamoorthi’s campaign watch party charged nearly $13 for water and $22 for wine. Several social-media users and political commentators mocked the prices, contrasting them with his campaign’s affordability message. The article also says Krishnamoorthi raised more than $30 million and that Fairshake spent against Stratton.
Krishnamoorthi said rising costs were the most pressing issue facing Illinois voters and described life as having become “simply too expensive.” The article says he narrowly lost the Democratic primary to Stratton, whose watch party had an open bar and free food. Fox News Digital said it contacted Krishnamoorthi’s campaign for comment.
Community verdict
7 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →Illinois representative and Senate candidate whose campaign's watch-party prices drew criticism.
Illinois lieutenant governor and Democratic Senate candidate who defeated Krishnamoorthi in the primary.
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSKrishnamoorthi lost Illinois’ Democratic Senate primary to Juliana Stratton, and his campaign’s election-night party charged nearly $13 for water. Right-leaning outlets frame the price as a contrast with his affordability message and emphasize the primary loss; the unrated article focuses on the vote result.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 55
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…