Mullin faces stormy DHS hearing; Rand Paul vows no vote
Paul challenged Mullin at the confirmation hearing and said he would vote against him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Daily News is an established newspaper with named authorship and a record of reported coverage. The article identifies its reporter and attributes key claims and quotations, though it provides limited detail on competing views of the hearing.
- Source type — Established newspaper with a substantial news operation.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The article uses attributed quotations and distinguishes statements from reported facts.
- Transparency — The page identifies the outlet, author and publication date.
The story includes direct quotations from the hearing and describes the shutdown’s effects, but offers limited sourcing beyond the participants and little detail about the competing positions on the nominee.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes statements from Mullin, Paul, Jeffries and Trump and explains both the Democrats’ funding conditions and Republicans’ refusal. It gives limited detail on the Republican rationale and relies on brief statements for several sides.
- Counterarguments presented — The article includes Republican and Democratic positions but gives little elaboration of the Republican case.
- Source diversity — Several lawmakers’ statements are included, but there are few sources outside the political participants.
- Loaded language — Charged descriptions and quotations are generally attributed rather than adopted as the article’s own verdict.
- Omitted context — The article gives limited background on the competing proposals and the confirmation process.
The report is largely event-focused and uses attributed statements, but its descriptions of Trump’s immigration approach and the shutdown include critical context without comparable detail from Republican defenders.
- Language tone — Mostly straight reporting, with some negative characterizations attributed to participants or presented as context.
- Framing — The story foregrounds the contentious hearing and the public effects of the shutdown.
- Source selection — Both parties are represented, though Democrats receive more explanation of their demands.
At Markwayne Mullin’s confirmation hearing to lead Homeland Security, Sen. Rand Paul said he would vote against him over Mullin’s comments about political violence. Mullin also addressed the DHS shutdown, immigration enforcement and alleged misconduct by federal agents.
At Mullin’s confirmation hearing, Paul called him a liar and accused him of promoting violence after Mullin said he understood why a neighbor had punched Paul. Paul said he would vote against Mullin, though it was unclear whether he would use his committee chairmanship to delay a vote. Mullin said he regretted accusing protester Alex Pretti of plotting to attack federal agents and said agents generally should obtain warrants before entering private property.
Community verdict
27 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator and chair of the Homeland Security Committee opposing Mullin’s nomination
Senator and nominee for secretary of Homeland Security
Mullin's version of this story ↗President who selected Mullin and opposed Democrats’ DHS funding terms
House Democratic leader calling for Republicans to fund DHS
Former Homeland Security secretary Mullin was tapped to replace
Part of a bigger story
36 OUTLETSAt Markwayne Mullin’s Senate confirmation hearing for Homeland Security secretary, Rand Paul challenged him over past remarks about Paul’s assault and political violence, and said he would vote against the nomination. Left-leaning outlets center Paul’s criticism, with some presenting it as merited and relevant to Mullin’s fitness. Center outlets pair the confrontation with Mullin’s answers and questions about DHS policy, funding, immigration and travel. Right-leaning outlets also stress the clash, while some foreground Mullin’s rebuttal or question Paul’s conduct.
- ARTICLES
- 39
- OUTLETS
- 36
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





