Democratic Turnout Surges in Mississippi’s US Senate Primaries, Nearly Matching GOP Vote Total
Colom won the Democratic Senate primary, and his campaign cited turnout as evidence of a competitive general election.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Mississippi Free Press is a regional news outlet with an identified author and a reported article that attributes campaign claims and turnout figures to their sources. The text alone offers limited evidence about its corrections history, but it shows transparency about sourcing.
- Source type — A regional news outlet, a source type generally associated with established editorial processes.
- Transparency — Turnout figures are attributed to the Associated Press and campaign arguments to Colom’s campaign memo.
- Author attribution — The article names its reporter.
- Editorial standards — The article distinguishes campaign assertions from reported vote totals; correction practices are not evident in the text.
The article gives specific vote counts, identifies their source, attributes campaign claims, and adds historical turnout context. Its account relies substantially on one campaign’s interpretation of the results and does not include a response from Hyde-Smith or her campaign.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article supplies turnout data and historical comparisons, and identifies the competitive-election claims as coming from Colom’s campaign. It does not include Hyde-Smith or her campaign’s perspective on the turnout or race.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Hyde-Smith or her campaign appears.
- Source diversity — The article combines vote tallies, historical context, and a campaign memo, but the campaign interpretation is one-sided.
- Opinion vs reporting — Campaign assertions are attributed, while the turnout figures and election results are reported as facts.
- Loaded language — The article’s own narration is restrained; more forceful claims are quoted from the campaign memo.
The article reports turnout figures and election results in largely neutral language. It attributes claims about the race’s competitiveness to Colom’s campaign rather than presenting them as established conclusions.
- Language tone — The article uses straightforward reporting language to describe turnout and results.
- Source selection — It cites vote tallies and includes statements from Colom’s campaign, without an opposing campaign response.
- Framing — The headline and opening emphasize Democratic turnout and the comparison with Republican turnout.
Mississippi’s Democratic Senate primary drew nearly as many voters as the Republican primary, and Scott Colom won the Democratic nomination. Colom’s campaign cited the turnout as evidence that he can compete against incumbent Cindy Hyde-Smith in November.
With most votes counted, more than 146,300 people had voted in the Democratic Senate primary and more than 156,600 in the Republican primary. The article estimated final totals of about 156,000 and 163,000, respectively, while noting that the 2018 Democratic Senate primary drew 87,931 voters.
Colom defeated his two Democratic primary opponents with about 73% of the vote. His campaign argued that the turnout and its view of Mississippi’s electorate made the state competitive, while the article also noted that presidential candidates were on the 2020 primary ballots and that Hyde-Smith defeated Republican challenger Sarah Adlakha in this year’s primary.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Colom in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Colom’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Republican incumbent facing Colom in the general election
Hyde-Smith's version of this story ↗President mentioned in a campaign memo’s comparison of Mississippi’s recent presidential vote
Republican Senate primary challenger
Former U.S. agriculture secretary and Hyde-Smith’s Democratic opponent in earlier Senate elections
Senator mentioned in the 2018 Republican primary comparison
Part of a bigger story
6 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 6
- AVG CRED
- 76
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




