Lindsey Graham: A devilish warmonger in service of Israel and defense industry at America's expense
The article criticizes Graham’s support for military action and arms transfers, arguing that it benefits Israel and defense companies.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYMiddle East Monitor identifies the author and labels the piece as opinion, but this article is polemical and offers limited sourcing for its central claims. The institutional score reflects the outlet rather than treating this opinion piece as original reported journalism.
- Editorial standards — The article includes an opinion disclaimer, but provides little visible evidence for several consequential allegations.
- Source type — An international news outlet, but this page is explicitly an opinion article.
- Author attribution — The author is named.
The piece names Graham and supplies examples of his statements, but relies on strongly evaluative language and makes claims about donations, motives and consequences without citing documents or presenting competing views.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is an openly labeled opinion piece that advances a sustained case against Graham, uses loaded language and provides no counterargument or response from him.
- Counterarguments presented — No opposing account or response from Graham is included.
- Loaded language — The article repeatedly uses highly condemnatory terms and metaphors.
- Opinion vs reporting — The page is explicitly labeled as opinion and argues a clear verdict.
The article uses strongly condemnatory language and frames Graham’s support for Israel and military spending as corrupt and harmful. It presents no countervailing perspective.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “devilish,” “blood-soaked” and “merchants of death.”
- Framing — Frames Graham’s positions as serving Israel and defense-industry profits at the expense of Americans.
- Source selection — Presents the author’s case without responses from Graham or other perspectives.
Ahmed Asmar argues that Senator Lindsey Graham’s support for U.S. military action and arms transfers serves Israel and defense companies at the expense of Americans. The opinion piece cites campaign contributions and Graham’s public comments about conflicts involving Iran, Gaza and Ukraine.
Asmar portrays Graham as a leading supporter of U.S. military action and argues that his positions benefit Israel and defense companies rather than the public. The article claims Graham’s campaigns received at least $2.1 million from defense corporations since 2018 and also refers to contributions from pro-Israel lobby groups. It offers no documentation or response from Graham in the text.
The article cites Graham’s comments about the cost of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran, his 2024 call for weapons to continue flowing to Israel, and his 2025 argument that weapons shipments to Ukraine would boost American manufacturing. Asmar argues that military spending could instead support domestic needs and describes a cycle linking defense-industry donations, weapons sales and conflict.
Community verdict
5 VOTES- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 50% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
People in this story
Senator criticized for supporting U.S. military action and weapons transfers
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
