Ro Khanna Backs Pat Buchanan, Hasan Piker, & Nazi Tattoo Guy
Khanna used a series of posts to defend his views on Gaza and criticize U.S. foreign policy.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYMediaite is an established digital news outlet with named authors and original reporting, though its coverage often uses a highly interpretive style. The article identifies the sources of the central claims but offers limited independent verification or response from the people it criticizes.
- Source type — An established digital news outlet, though not a newspaper of record or wire service.
- Editorial standards — The article identifies the column and posts it discusses, but uses highly interpretive framing.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
The article quotes Khanna’s posts and identifies the critical column that prompted them, but provides little independent context or response from the people whose past remarks it criticizes. Its loaded descriptions also blur reporting with commentary.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Khanna’s own posts, but its framing and contextual details largely support the case against him. It does not provide responses from the people whose statements it criticizes or substantial context for their positions.
- Counterarguments presented — Khanna’s posts are quoted, but there is little substantive defense or context for the criticized figures.
- Loaded language — Several descriptions are evaluative and sharpen the critical framing.
- Source diversity — The piece draws on Khanna’s posts and a critical column, with few other perspectives.
The article’s framing is strongly critical of Khanna and emphasizes damaging associations, using evaluative language while giving little space to context that might support his position.
- Language tone — Uses phrases such as “wild tweetstorm” and “full-throated endorsement” in a critical presentation.
- Framing — Frames Khanna’s comments through associations with controversial figures and their alleged or reported remarks.
- Source selection — Features a critical column and criticism of the figures Khanna supports, with limited balancing context.
Rep. Ro Khanna answered a critical column with a series of posts defending his views on Gaza and criticizing what he called neoconservative foreign policy. He also expressed support for Graham Platner and Hasan Piker, drawing criticism in the article over their past associations and remarks.
Khanna responded to a critical Washington Post column by James Kirchick, saying the criticism was tied to his characterization of events in Gaza as genocide. In posts on X, Khanna also criticized journalist John Podhoretz over his support for the Iraq War and Israel’s actions, and for calling Pat Buchanan antisemitic after Buchanan criticized Israel’s bombing of Lebanon.
Khanna said he was proud to stand with Senate candidate Graham Platner and to join Hasan Piker’s feed, and called for a “new moral direction” in response to past and current U.S. wars. The article highlights Platner’s covered-up Nazi tattoo and reported affinity for an antisemitic conspiracy theorist, as well as remarks by Piker that it characterizes as minimizing the October 7 attack and making derogatory comparisons.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative responding to a critical column and defending his foreign-policy statements
Maine Senate candidate whom Khanna said he was proud to stand with
Senator cited as an example of calling out antisemitism among Republicans
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 2
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


