Joe Scarborough Slams Lindsey Graham's Cuba Threats
Scarborough argued that interventionist rhetoric risks weakening the United States and bringing disaster.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYMediaite is an established digital news outlet with named authors and identifiable reporting, though this piece chiefly presents a television discussion rather than extensive independent reporting. Its claims are attributed to the speakers or to the Wall Street Journal.
- Source type — National news outlet with an established presence in political and media coverage.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The story distinguishes quoted remarks from the Wall Street Journal report it references, but offers limited original corroboration.
- Transparency — The publisher and source program are identified.
The article provides direct quotations and identifies the speakers, while attributing its report about Graham’s discussions in Israel to the Wall Street Journal. Most of the piece reproduces one host’s argument, with little context or response from Graham.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Graham’s comments are quoted, but the article devotes substantially more space to Scarborough’s criticism and provides no response from Graham to that criticism or broader context on the potential policy.
- Counterarguments presented — Graham’s Cuba remarks appear, but there is no reply to Scarborough’s arguments.
- Source diversity — The extended discussion comes from Scarborough and Brzezinski, with no independent expert or official perspective.
- Opinion vs reporting — The story reports a television exchange but reproduces an extended opinionated monologue.
- Omitted context — It provides little context about any actual U.S. policy toward Cuba or the Iran campaign.
The piece foregrounds criticism of interventionist rhetoric, but attributes that criticism to Scarborough and includes Graham’s remarks directly. Its framing suggests a mild tilt against military adventurism rather than a clear partisan position.
- Framing — The article leads with Scarborough’s warning about militarism and gives his critique most of the space.
- Source selection — Graham’s statement is included, but the extended commentary comes from critics of the proposed intervention.
- Language tone — Most evaluative language is presented as direct quotation rather than the reporter’s own characterization.
Sen. Lindsey Graham suggested Cuba could be a future target after the Iran campaign, prompting Joe Scarborough to warn that military adventurism could bring disaster. The article centers on their opposing views about U.S. military intervention.
Graham teased possible U.S. action in Cuba after the campaign against Iran, saying, “The liberation of Cuba is upon us. It’s just a matter of time.” The article also reports, citing the Wall Street Journal, that Graham had recently spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about lobbying President Donald Trump to attack Iran.
On Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough called Graham’s rhetoric “Wilsonian adventurism” and argued that attempts to export democracy through military action had weakened the United States. Mika Brzezinski questioned whether invading Cuba was among Trump’s promises; Scarborough replied that he did not remember such a promise.
Community verdict
17 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Morning Joe host criticizing Graham’s comments about Cuba and military intervention
Senator who suggested Cuba could be a future target for U.S. action
Graham's version of this story ↗President discussed in connection with Graham’s comments about Iran and Cuba
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


