Keith Raffel: Yellow dogs and red lines | News, Sports, Jobs
Raffel recounts controversies involving Platner and criticizes Democratic leaders for continuing to support him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Maui News is a local news outlet, a source type that generally has newsroom standards, though this page is an explicitly bylined opinion column rather than original reported news. The author is identified and the column refers to reporting by named publications.
- Source type — Local news publication; a credible regional source type.
- Author attribution — The column is bylined and includes information about the author.
- Editorial standards — The page is clearly labeled as an opinion column, distinguishing it from reporting.
- Source selection — The column attributes some claims to named news organizations, though it does not provide direct links or extensive documentation.
The column identifies several sources and includes quotations, but it is openly argumentative, relies on selected reporting and claims without much supporting documentation, and offers little response or context from the candidates discussed.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is an opinion column that argues for a clear verdict about partisan loyalty and candidate fitness. It includes some attributed statements and criticism of candidates in both parties, but does not present their responses or develop competing interpretations.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an explicitly argumentative column, not a report presenting competing accounts.
- Counterarguments presented — The candidates' own explanations and responses are largely absent or briefly characterized.
- Loaded language — The author uses evaluative terms including “sordid,” “self-righteous” and “yellow dog.”
- Source diversity — The column refers to several publications and political figures but does not provide a balanced range of direct perspectives.
The column criticizes candidates and party loyalty on both sides, but its language and framing especially target Democratic support for Platner while praising a centrist Democrat. The mixed criticism keeps the lean modest.
- Framing — Frames Democratic support for Platner as party loyalty without principles, while presenting Auchincloss as a principled contrast.
- Language tone — Uses sharply critical descriptions of both parties' candidates and voters.
- Source selection — Cites reporting and commentary that support its criticism of the candidates, without offering their substantive responses.
- Headline — The headline’s yellow-dog and red-line contrast signals a critical argument about partisan loyalty.
Keith Raffel argues that party loyalty can lead voters and political leaders to support candidates despite serious controversies. He contrasts support for Ken Paxton and Graham Platner with Representative Jake Auchincloss’s refusal to back either candidate.
Raffel describes Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton’s past legal and political controversies and notes that former Representative Joe Barton says he will not vote for the Democratic candidate. He also cites a poll showing Paxton and Democratic nominee James Talarico running neck-and-neck. In Maine, Raffel recounts controversies involving Graham Platner, including past social media posts and reporting about his tattoo, while Senators Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer reaffirmed support for him.
Raffel presents Representative Jake Auchincloss as a contrast: Auchincloss calls Platner’s tattoo and commentary disqualifying, while also criticizing Senator Susan Collins and saying he cannot support Platner. Raffel praises Auchincloss for putting principles above party and argues that support for Nazi symbols should be a red line.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Platner in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Platner’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Democratic Senate candidate whose past statements and tattoo are central to the column’s argument about party loyalty
Republican Senate candidate whose record and party support are used as an example of partisan loyalty
Paxton's version of this story ↗Representative whose refusal to support either Senate candidate is presented as a principled alternative to party loyalty
Auchincloss's version of this story ↗Democratic Senate candidate and Paxton’s opponent
Former representative who says he will not vote for the Democratic candidate
Maine senator and Platner’s opponent
President referenced in Auchincloss’s comparison to Republican support in 2016
Senator who reaffirmed his support for Platner
Senate Minority Leader who reaffirmed his endorsement of Platner
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








