Talk about rigged elections. In Montana, Republicans snub voters to anoint a U.S. senator
Alme entered the race shortly before the filing deadline and received endorsements from prominent Montana Republicans.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Los Angeles Times is an established national news organization with professional editorial practices and an identifiable author. This page is an opinion column, so its argument should be distinguished from straight reporting.
- Source type — Established national newspaper with a substantial reporting operation.
- Editorial standards — A professional newsroom, though this piece is explicitly argumentative rather than straight news.
- Author attribution — The column names its author.
- Transparency — The publisher and author are clearly identified.
The column supplies specific timing, describes the political consequences it sees, and quotes a political science professor and a candidate. It makes a forceful argument but provides limited source diversity and little independent evidence for some of its broader claims.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is an opinion column advocating changes to election rules. It presents little defense of the politicians whose actions it condemns, though it includes a skeptical assessment of whether Bodnar can benefit politically.
- Opinion vs reporting — The column advances an explicit argument for laws protecting voter choice.
- Counterarguments presented — It does not give Daines, Alme or Garcia a response to the criticism.
- Source diversity — A political science professor and Bodnar are quoted, but perspectives defending the criticized maneuvers are absent.
- Loaded language — The author uses pointed language to condemn the maneuvers.
The column criticizes election maneuvering by both Republicans and Democrats and argues for rules that preserve voter choice. Its tone is strongly critical of the conduct, but the framing does not show a clear partisan lean.
- Framing — Criticizes Daines and Garcia for limiting voters’ choices, applying the criticism across parties.
- Language tone — Uses charged terms such as “cynical maneuver” and “undemocratic shenanigans” against the political tactics, not just one party.
- Source selection — Includes criticism from Bodnar and analysis from political scientist Kal Munis, with little defense of the politicians criticized.
Steve Daines withdrew from Montana’s Senate race just after the filing deadline, while his preferred successor, Kurt Alme, entered minutes before it. The column argues that the coordinated handoff limited voters’ choices and compares it with similar maneuvering in Illinois and California.
The column says Steve Daines announced he would not seek reelection two minutes after Montana’s candidate filing deadline, while Kurt Alme entered the race ten minutes before it. President Trump, Gov. Greg Gianforte and Sen. Tim Sheehy endorsed Alme. Seth Bodnar criticized the handoff as denying Montana Republicans a voice, though political scientist Kal Munis doubted the backlash would translate into enough votes to help Bodnar.
Community verdict
7 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Montana senator who withdrew from reelection and backed Kurt Alme as his successor
Daines's version of this story ↗House candidate endorsed by Darrell Issa
Former senator and presidential candidate referenced in Montana’s 2008 election history
President who endorsed Alme
Montana senator who endorsed Alme
California representative who announced he would not seek reelection and endorsed Jim Desmond
Former Montana senator referenced in the state’s political history
Montana governor who endorsed Alme
Washington representative who introduced a resolution rebuking Chuy García
Illinois representative whose retirement timing left his preferred successor as the only major Democrat on the ballot
Independent Senate candidate who criticized the handoff
House candidate and Chuy García’s preferred successor
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…











