Skip to main content
1 min read
● InformationalCongress / Members

Waiting for Susan Collins' signature act

The letter contrasts Collins’s bipartisan approach with Smith’s independence and says Maine is still waiting for a defining act.

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Host credibilityLewiston Sun JournalNOT RATED
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026

Credibility rates Lewiston Sun Journal, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.

Republished

Republished from Centralmaine.com. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.

Centralmaine.com75/100 HIGH

59 stories · 74–75 · updated Oct 9, 2026

This is Centralmaine.com's own score, and this article is credited to Centralmaine.com. The host score in the Source Check is Lewiston Sun Journal's.

Lewiston Sun Journalvia Centralmaine.com
Apr 3, 2026
tl;dr

A letter compares Susan Collins with former Sen. Margaret Chase Smith, praising Smith’s independence and arguing that Collins has yet to take a similarly defining stand. The writer says Collins’s record of bipartisan deal-making has left Maine waiting for a “signature act.”

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Susan M. Collins R · ME · SEN
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Collins in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Collins’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

Susan M. Collins
R · ME · SEN

U.S. senator whose leadership is compared with Margaret Chase Smith’s

PRIMARY SUBJECT
ALSO MENTIONED  Joseph McCarthy, Senator opposed by Smith in her 1950 speech; Margaret Chase Smith, Former U.S. senator used as a contrast to Collins

Part of a bigger story

3 OUTLETS
Susan Collins Supports SAVE America Act

Outlets agree that Susan Collins supports the SAVE America Act, whose voting requirements are central to the letters about her position. Left-leaning outlets criticize her support as contrary to Maine voters’ preferences and fault her leadership as lacking a defining stand. Center outlets split: one letter says the requirements burden voters, while another presents them as safeguards for election integrity.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…