Facing heat from Democrats, Collins team calls corruption allegations 'outrageous'
Collins’s campaign rejected allegations that her office steered federal contracts to a donor.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Lewiston Sun Journal, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
The Lewiston Sun Journal is an established regional newspaper with an identified reporter and original local coverage. The story attributes its central allegations to ProPublica and includes responses from Collins’s campaign and an FBI spokesperson.
- Source type — Established local newspaper with a regional reporting operation.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Source transparency — Identifies ProPublica as the source of the investigative reporting and names people quoted.
- Editorial standards — The reporting presents the campaign's response and an FBI statement alongside the allegations.
The article gives specific allegations and attributes them to ProPublica, while also including the campaign’s denial and the reported FBI finding that nothing implicated Collins or her campaign. Collins does not speak directly, and much of the underlying account is summarized from another outlet.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story gives substantial space to both the allegations and Collins’s campaign response, and includes the reported FBI conclusion that it found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign. Collins herself is not quoted, and the reporting relies in part on ProPublica’s account.
- Counterarguments presented — The campaign denies requiring contributions for meetings and disputes the donor’s account.
- Source diversity — Includes Democrats, the campaign, ProPublica’s account and an FBI spokesperson.
- Omitted context — Collins does not respond directly in the article.
- Loaded language — Charged terms are attributed to the people making the allegations or denials.
The article reports the allegations and the campaign’s rebuttal in attributed language without adopting either side’s claims as its own. Its wording is largely matter-of-fact.
- Language tone — Uses attributed claims and responses rather than overtly partisan descriptions.
- Source selection — Includes Democratic critics, Collins’s campaign manager, ProPublica’s reporting and an FBI statement.
- Framing — Frames the piece around the dispute and campaign response.
Republished
Republished from Portland Press Herald. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
80 stories · 77–79 · updated Oct 6, 2026
This is Portland Press Herald's own score, and this article is credited to Portland Press Herald. The host score in the Source Check is Lewiston Sun Journal's.
Maine Democrats publicized allegations that Sen. Susan Collins helped steer federal contracts to a donor, drawing a defense from her campaign manager. The dispute follows new ProPublica reporting and comes as Collins seeks reelection against Troy Jackson.
Maine Democrats held a news conference to highlight ProPublica reporting that a company executive told investigators Collins’s office sought a campaign contribution before meeting with him, and that a pro-Collins super PAC leader discussed federal contracts in connection with a donation. ProPublica also reported that federal authorities dropped a probe of Collins and other lawmakers after President Trump returned to office. Collins’s campaign manager, Steve Abbott, called the allegations recycled and denied that campaign contributions were required for meetings.
Abbott said Collins’s office advocated for projects it considered worthy and disputed claims about her dealings with the donor. ProPublica reported that the FBI found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign. Former Maine CDC director Nirav Shah said Collins and other elected officials should have spoken out against dismantling the FBI public-integrity unit. Collins is seeking a sixth term and faces Democrat Troy Jackson.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSED
No good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Collins in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Collins’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Maine senator whose campaign is responding to corruption allegations
Former Maine CDC director who criticized Collins’s response to the FBI unit’s dismantling
President whose administration dismantled the FBI public-integrity unit
Democratic Senate candidate challenging Collins
Part of a bigger story
24 OUTLETSProPublica reported allegations linking Collins, a defense contractor, federal contracts and campaign contributions, and described an FBI inquiry; Collins denied wrongdoing. Left-leaning outlets emphasize the alleged contract-and-donation links and the reported end of the FBI inquiry. Center outlets generally pair the allegations with Collins’s denials, while also tracking campaign effects and scrutinizing claims. Right-leaning outlets focus on Collins’s rebuttal and challenge the report’s timing, sourcing or credibility.
- ARTICLES
- 28
- OUTLETS
- 24
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…