Trump doubles down as GOP senators stall on AG confirmation
Tillis sought assurances that Blanche would eliminate the fund and argued it should not pay people who assaulted police.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates KBZK News, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
KBZK is a regional news outlet with a named author, and the article attributes key statements to the people who made them. The text provides limited information about the outlet’s corrections practices or reporting process.
- Source type — Regional news outlet; a moderately positive institutional signal.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Editorial standards — The article is written as attributed news reporting, but the text alone offers limited detail on editorial safeguards.
- Correction history — No correction practices or record are evident in the article.
The article includes direct remarks from Trump, Tillis and Murkowski and describes the senators’ concerns. It gives limited sourcing for Blanche’s reported remarks and offers little additional context or response from Blanche.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports both Trump’s defense and senators’ objections, including concerns about the fund and tax settlement. It does not include a direct response from Blanche or extensive independent context about the fund.
- Counterarguments presented — Trump’s position and senators’ objections are both represented.
- Source diversity — Several political figures are quoted or described, but independent sources are limited.
- Omitted context — The article provides little detail on the fund’s operation or Blanche’s response.
- Loaded language — Strong language appears primarily in attributed quotations.
The article presents the dispute in largely descriptive language, quoting Trump’s defense of the fund as well as Tillis’s criticism and senators’ stated concerns. No clear partisan framing is apparent.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive wording, with charged phrases attributed to the speakers.
- Source selection — Includes statements from Trump, Tillis and Murkowski and reports Cornyn’s position.
- Framing — Frames the story around the confirmation dispute and disagreement over the fund.
Republished
Republished from Scrippsnews. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
Not rated.
President Donald Trump defended the anti-weaponization fund as Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis withheld support for acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s confirmation, seeking assurances about the fund and a tax settlement. Senator Lisa Murkowski also said she wanted assurances before moving forward.
Trump criticized Cornyn in a Truth Social post over the anti-weaponization fund and his support for Cornyn’s primary opponent. Trump later said the fund was “dead,” while also saying he wished it were not. Tillis said he was trying to formally end the fund and argued that people who assaulted police should not receive federal payments.
Cornyn and Tillis had sought written proof that Blanche would eliminate the fund before proceeding with his confirmation. Murkowski said she wanted assurances about both the fund and a $1.776 billion tax settlement between Trump and the IRS; the article reports Blanche played a role in negotiating that settlement. The senators’ support for Blanche’s confirmation remained uncertain.
Community verdict
16 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator withholding support for Todd Blanche’s confirmation
Cornyn's version of this story ↗President defending the anti-weaponization fund amid opposition to his attorney general pick
Trump's version of this story ↗Acting attorney general and nominee for attorney general
Former president, referenced in connection with the certification of the election and January 6 prosecutions
Senator seeking assurances before moving forward with Blanche’s nomination
Part of a bigger story
36 OUTLETSOutlets agree Senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn withheld support for attorney general nominee Todd Blanche, demanding the Justice Department rescind a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund and clarify a tax settlement. Left-leaning outlets view the fund as a corrupt measure benefiting Donald Trump and question whether Blanche's concessions will hold. Center outlets focus on the committee standoff and the procedural negotiations that led Blanche to rescind the fund. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Trump's sharp clash with the senators and the political maneuvering over the nomination.
- ARTICLES
- 46
- OUTLETS
- 36
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





