Turns Out Susan Collins Was Way More of a Sellout Than We Thought
ProPublica reported that an FBI probe examined whether Collins steered federal funding to a contractor whose CEO allegedly routed campaign money to her.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYJezebel is an established digital publication, but this page is an unsigned, highly opinionated account that relies substantially on ProPublica’s reporting. The page itself gives limited information about editorial standards or corrections practices.
- Source type — An established digital news outlet, though this piece is commentary-driven rather than straight reporting.
- Transparency — The article names ProPublica as the source of the underlying report but offers little information about its own reporting process.
- Author attribution — No author is identified in the article metadata.
- Editorial standards — The article’s language is openly polemical, limiting confidence in its presentation as neutral reporting.
The article attributes key allegations to ProPublica and includes specific details from that report, but it does not offer Collins’s response or an independent account of the evidence. Its highly charged language also blurs the line between reported allegations and the writer’s conclusions.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article attributes its central allegations to ProPublica but presents them in a strongly accusatory frame and includes no response from Collins or other countervailing perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Collins or a representative is included.
- Loaded language — Repeated insults and accusations make the presentation overtly one-sided.
- Source diversity — The account primarily draws on ProPublica’s report and quoted material from it.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and reporting are interwoven without a neutral separation.
The article uses strongly disparaging language about Collins and Trump and frames the reported allegations as evidence of corruption. Its framing is sharply critical rather than politically neutral.
- Language tone — Uses insults and dismissive phrases, including calling Collins an “awful human being” and Trump a “buffoon.”
- Framing — Presents the report as a political scandal and characterizes Collins as a sellout.
- Source selection — Relies on ProPublica’s findings and provides no response from Collins or an alternative account.
ProPublica reported that an FBI probe examined whether Sen. Susan Collins steered federal funding to a military contractor whose CEO allegedly routed campaign contributions to her through straw donors. The article also says the investigation stalled after the Trump administration dismantled an FBI unit focused on congressional misconduct.
The article summarizes ProPublica’s report that investigators examined Collins’s relationship with Navatek and its CEO, Martin Kao. According to the reporting quoted in the article, Kao and his wife contributed to Collins before she placed $8 million in research funding into the federal budget, and Kao allegedly used straw donors to send her about $33,000. The article also recounts an alleged 2019 meeting where Collins, her super PAC head and Navatek executives discussed a contribution through a shell company.
The article says the FBI was considering a broader investigation into whether lawmakers had been bribed, but that the Trump administration broke up the FBI unit handling congressional misconduct investigations and fired two agents who had worked on the matter. It presents these events in strongly critical terms and does not include a response from Collins.
Community verdict
13 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose relationship with a military contractor was examined in an FBI probe
President whose administration is described as dismantling the FBI unit handling congressional misconduct investigations
Part of a bigger story
24 OUTLETSProPublica reported allegations linking Collins, a defense contractor, federal contracts and campaign contributions, and described an FBI inquiry; Collins denied wrongdoing. Left-leaning outlets emphasize the alleged contract-and-donation links and the reported end of the FBI inquiry. Center outlets generally pair the allegations with Collins’s denials, while also tracking campaign effects and scrutinizing claims. Right-leaning outlets focus on Collins’s rebuttal and challenge the report’s timing, sourcing or credibility.
- ARTICLES
- 27
- OUTLETS
- 24
- AVG CRED
- 66
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


