Brian Fitzpatrick says he wants to make changes at ICE and end the DHS shutdown
Suozzi is working with Fitzpatrick on proposed limits and oversight for ICE agents.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Inquirer is an established regional newspaper, and this article has a named reporter and attributes key statements to the lawmakers who made them. The short report provides useful context but relies substantially on comments from the two lawmakers.
- Source type — Established regional news organization with a record of local and political reporting.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The outlet operates as a professional newsroom; the article distinguishes reported facts from attributed statements.
- Source diversity — Provides background and opposing political positions, but the proposal is mainly described through its two proponents.
The article gives clear context for the shutdown, describes the lawmakers’ proposed changes and includes statements from both of them. It offers limited independent sourcing on the proposal’s details and does not include a response from opponents or affected agencies.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story presents the two lawmakers’ views and explains the parties’ competing approaches to DHS funding. It gives limited space to opponents of the proposed deal or to independent perspectives on the proposed ICE changes.
- Counterarguments presented — Explains that Democrats seek ICE policy changes while Republicans have blocked funding individual agencies and opposed temporary funding for all of DHS.
- Source diversity — Includes remarks from both lawmakers working on the proposal, but no outside experts or agency representatives.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is presented as reporting and attributes evaluative claims to their speakers.
- Loaded language — The language is generally neutral; charged descriptions appear in attributed quotations.
The article reports the proposal and shutdown in straightforward language, attributes opinions to the lawmakers and includes context about the positions of both parties.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive and attributed, without conspicuously partisan language.
- Source selection — Quotes both proponents and describes the competing Democratic and Republican funding positions.
- Framing — Frames the proposal as an effort to address both ICE practices and the DHS funding impasse.
Brian Fitzpatrick and Tom Suozzi are working on a bipartisan proposal to change ICE practices and fund the Department of Homeland Security. The effort comes as a funding impasse has shut down parts of DHS and a Senate vote to advance funding failed.
Fitzpatrick and Suozzi said they are working on a deal that would generally prohibit ICE agents from wearing masks, require body cameras and align ICE protocols and training with those of other federal law enforcement agencies. Fitzpatrick said public trust in ICE needs to be repaired, while Suozzi described concerns about masked agents. They said they hope to reach an agreement and seek support from colleagues.
The partial DHS shutdown began Feb. 14 after Democrats tied support for additional funding to changes in ICE policies. The article says some DHS agencies remain without funding, while ICE and Customs and Border Protection continued receiving funds under the One Big Beautiful Bill. On Friday, the Senate again failed to advance DHS funding, with a 47-37 vote; John Fetterman joined Republicans in favor.
Community verdict
22 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative working with Fitzpatrick on a proposed ICE and DHS funding deal
Representative working on a proposal to reform ICE and fund DHS
Fitzpatrick's version of this story ↗President whose administration reduced immigration enforcement agents’ presence in Minneapolis
Senator who voted in favor of advancing DHS funding
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



