Opinion: Independent candidacy in Idaho
Clark argues that Achilles’s independent candidacy is a personal choice and a response to the major parties’ failures.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Idaho State Journal is an established local news outlet, which supports a solid institutional credibility assessment. This is a clearly attributed guest opinion column, so its claims should be understood as the author’s argument rather than independent reporting.
- Source type — Established local newspaper; a credible regional outlet.
- Author attribution — The piece identifies Trent Clark as a guest columnist.
- Editorial standards — The opinion format is explicit, though the article itself does not establish the outlet’s corrections or reporting practices.
The column presents a coherent argument and gives some supporting examples, but most claims are asserted by the author without named sources or detailed evidence. It acknowledges a contrary perception of Achilles’s candidacy but does not offer opposing voices or a developed counterargument.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is an openly argued opinion column supporting the legitimacy of independent candidacies and criticizing party behavior. It notes that some see Achilles’s run as a Democratic ploy, but does not develop that view through another source or a substantial counterargument.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is a guest column advancing the author’s own argument.
- Counterarguments presented — Mentions the claim that Achilles’s candidacy is a Democratic ploy, then rejects it without presenting its proponents’ case.
- Source diversity — Relies on the author’s perspective and does not quote independent sources.
The author criticizes the Republican Party’s more militant wing and speaks favorably of Achilles, but also argues that both major parties have structural shortcomings. The overall framing shows a slight leftward tilt rather than a strongly partisan argument.
- Framing — Frames independent candidacy as a response to party failures, while criticizing both major parties.
- Language tone — Uses critical language about the Idaho Republican Party’s populist militancy.
- Source selection — Presents the guest columnist’s perspective without outside sources or opposing voices.
Guest columnist Trent Clark argues Todd Achilles’s independent U.S. Senate candidacy is a consequence of political parties failing to appeal to voters, not a Democratic ploy, and says independent candidacies are not a cure for that failure.
Trent Clark says Idaho voters’ dissatisfaction with political parties may make independent candidacies appealing. He rejects the claim that Todd Achilles’s run as an independent is a Democratic ploy, describing Achilles favorably and arguing that running independently can make fundraising, recruitment and media coverage harder. Clark also notes that Democrat David Roth’s withdrawal left Achilles and Republican Jim Risch in the Senate race.
Clark argues that independent campaigns can divert money and volunteer effort from political parties, while party failures to appeal beyond their wings help create the conditions for such candidacies. He predicts Idaho will not shift toward electing independent candidates statewide and concludes that independent candidacy is a symptom of a failing political system, not its remedy.
Community verdict
2 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Republican in the Idaho U.S. Senate race
Democrat who withdrew from the Idaho U.S. Senate race
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
