Senate candidates Graham, Andrews trade barbs on S.C. campaign trail
Andrews promoted a taxpayer pledge and criticized Graham’s qualifications and reliance on her family name.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYWRDW/WAGT is a local news outlet with an identified author and clear outlet attribution. The available information supports a credible local-news assessment, though it provides limited evidence about the publisher’s corrections practices or broader reporting record.
- Source type — Local news station reporting on a state campaign; a generally credible institutional source.
- Author attribution — The article names an author and identifies WRDW/WAGT.
- Editorial standards — The text attributes candidate claims to speakers, but provides little information about the outlet’s standards.
- Correction history — No corrections information is presented in the article.
The article reports campaign events and includes direct quotes from both candidates, allowing readers to compare their attacks and Andrews’s pledge. It offers little independent context, verification, or detail about the proposals and allegations.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Both candidates’ campaign activity and criticisms are represented, but the article offers little outside context or examination of the claims and proposals.
- Counterarguments presented — Both candidates’ criticisms of one another are included.
- Source diversity — The article quotes both candidates and one Graham supporter, but includes little independent sourcing.
- Omitted context — It gives limited detail on the pledge and does not substantiate the candidates’ characterizations of each other.
- Loaded language — Strong language is attributed to the candidates rather than adopted by the report.
The report uses straightforward language and gives both candidates space to criticize the other. It does not clearly favor either candidate in its framing.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral reporting language; sharper wording appears in attributed candidate quotes.
- Source selection — Both candidates are quoted directly, along with a supporter of Graham.
- Framing — The story frames the events as competing campaign appearances and mutual attacks.
South Carolina Senate candidates Darline Graham and Annie Andrews campaigned Monday and traded attacks. Andrews also promoted a pledge to cut wasteful spending, government abuse and the national debt.
With Election Day a little over six weeks away, Republican incumbent Darline Graham and Democratic challenger Annie Andrews made campaign stops in the Upstate, and Graham also campaigned in the Midlands. Andrews promoted a taxpayer pledge calling for cuts to wasteful spending, government abuse and the national debt.
Graham called Andrews radical and said her views were out of step with South Carolina voters. Andrews said Graham was unprepared and unqualified and relied on her family name. Andrews also criticized both parties’ spending, citing Democratic programs and Republican spending on wars and corporations.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Republican incumbent in the South Carolina Senate race
Graham's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSAnnie Andrews promoted a taxpayer pledge while campaigning alongside South Carolina Senate candidate Darline Graham. The candidates also exchanged attacks during the campaign events. Center outlets pair Andrews’s pledge with the candidates’ campaign exchanges, including her criticism of Graham’s qualifications and reliance on her family name.
- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

