Sen. Van Hollen tells DHS Secretary Mullin to calm down at hearing
Mullin disputed the senators’ allegations and questioned whether some courts were acting impartially.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYFox News is an established national outlet with a substantial reporting operation, though its broader editorial identity is partisan. This account attributes claims to named participants and reports their exchange directly.
- Source type — Established national news organization with a substantial reporting operation.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has an established editorial operation, alongside a recognizable partisan identity.
- Author attribution — The article names its author.
The article provides direct quotations from the hearing and identifies the participants, but offers little independent context or verification of the underlying claims about DHS actions, court orders, or spending.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story includes the senators’ criticisms and Mullin’s responses, but does not independently examine the evidence behind their competing claims or provide outside perspectives.
- Counterarguments presented — Mullin’s responses appear alongside the senators’ criticisms.
- Source diversity — The account relies on statements from the hearing participants and offers no outside sources.
- Omitted context — It gives little context for the shootings, court orders, or disputed spending.
The article primarily recounts the exchange through attributed statements and does not clearly endorse either side. Its focus on the confrontation does not establish a discernible partisan lean.
- Language tone — Mostly reports the participants’ words with neutral attribution.
- Framing — Centers on a heated hearing exchange without an explicit conclusion about who is right.
- Source selection — Quotes Van Hollen, Murphy, and Mullin, the principal participants in the exchange.
At a Senate hearing, Chris Van Hollen and Chris Murphy challenged Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin over alleged misconduct by federal officers and compliance with court orders. Mullin disputed their claims and questioned the courts’ impartiality.
During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Van Hollen accused DHS of a pattern of abuse in immigration enforcement and pressed Mullin to share evidence from officer-involved shootings with Minnesota authorities. Mullin rejected the characterization and disputed Van Hollen’s concerns about trusting the administration’s investigation.
Murphy asked Mullin whether DHS would comply with court orders and criticized the department’s spending on detention centers. Mullin said the department would follow the law and Constitution, but questioned whether some courts were acting impartially.
Community verdict
17 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Homeland Security Secretary responding to senators’ criticism of DHS
Senator who questioned Mullin about court orders and DHS spending
Murphy's version of this story ↗Senator who challenged the Homeland Security secretary over DHS enforcement and evidence-sharing
Van Hollen's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
7 OUTLETSAt a House Homeland Security hearing, Rep. Al Green and Secretary Markwayne Mullin clashed over whether Green had called Mullin racist; Green told Mullin to stop speaking, and the committee chair intervened. Center outlets mainly recount the exchanges, with some attention to Green’s primary loss and Rep. Shri Thanedar’s separate challenge over DHS posts. Right-leaning outlets include accounts that portray Mullin as prevailing over accusations, alongside reports that recount the exchanges without a clear verdict.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 7
- AVG CRED
- 53
- The American Bazaar · Rep. Shri Thanedar and DHS secretary clash over 'racist' social media posts at congressional hearing
- Fox News · Rep. Al Green tells DHS Secretary Mullin to shut up during hearing
- twitchy.com · Rep. Shri Thanedar Gets Cooked by Markwayne Mullin Over 'Racist' DHS Social Media Posts
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




