LARRY KUDLOW: Lindsey Graham would be smacking Iran even harder right now
Kudlow recounts Trump’s account of Iran negotiations and his decision to guard the Strait of Hormuz and restore a naval blockade.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYFox Business is an established national outlet, and the column is clearly attributed to its author. This is opinion writing, however, rather than independently reported coverage, and the publisher’s general credibility does not establish the column’s claims.
- Source type — Established national news publisher, supporting a relatively strong institutional baseline.
- Author attribution — The piece is clearly attributed to Larry Kudlow.
- Editorial standards — The column format is clear, but it is commentary rather than a reported article with demonstrated independent verification.
- Correction history — No correction or verification information is presented in the article.
The column includes a direct quotation attributed to Trump, but many consequential claims are presented without named corroborating sources or supporting documentation. Strongly evaluative language and limited engagement with other perspectives reduce its reporting quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The column is an openly one-sided argument for a stronger military response. It quotes Trump but gives no opposing view or substantive examination of the costs and risks of escalation.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive counterargument to expanded strikes is presented.
- Loaded language — The column uses highly charged descriptions of Iran and political opponents.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is commentary advocating a stronger response, not a balanced report.
- Source diversity — Few perspectives are represented, and no independent source is cited for several claims.
The piece strongly endorses Graham’s hawkish approach and presses for a tougher response to Iran. Its language disparages political opponents and offers no comparable opposing perspective.
- Language tone — Uses strongly approving language for Graham and inflammatory descriptions of Iran and political opponents.
- Framing — Frames a larger U.S. military response as the appropriate course and suggests it is overdue.
- Source selection — Relies on Kudlow’s commentary and Trump’s account without presenting alternative accounts or responses.
In an opinion column, Larry Kudlow praises the late Senator Lindsey Graham and argues that Graham would have supported stronger U.S. strikes against Iran. Kudlow recounts President Trump’s account of negotiations and the U.S. response to attacks in the Gulf region.
Kudlow describes Graham as a strong supporter of Israel and U.S. allies, and says Graham would have wanted bigger strikes against Iran. He also recalls Graham’s work on a budget bill and his defense of Brett Kavanaugh during confirmation hearings.
Kudlow recounts Trump’s description of an 11-hour meeting with Iran and reports that Trump had decided the United States would guard the Strait of Hormuz and restore a naval blockade on Iranian ports. Kudlow says Iran attacked an oil tanker and Gulf allies, and claims satellite images suggested Iran was rebuilding nuclear installations.
Community verdict
24 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President describing negotiations with Iran and the U.S. response
Senator mentioned as a possible next Senate budget chairman
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


