Skip to main content
1 min read
◆ Mixed look for PaxtonElections / Campaigns

CPAC endorses Ken Paxton in Texas Senate runoff against John Cornyn

Paxton received CPAC’s endorsement and criticized John Cornyn at the convention.

CPAC endorses Ken Paxton in Texas Senate runoff against John Cornyn
Image · Fox26houston

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Host credibilityFox26houstonNOT RATED
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026

Credibility rates Fox26houston, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.

Republished

Republished from Fox4news. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.

Fox4news75/100 HIGH

17 stories · 74–76 · updated Oct 8, 2026

This is Fox4news's own score, and this article is credited to Fox4news. The host score in the Source Check is Fox26houston's.

Fox26houstonvia Fox4news
Mar 28, 2026
tl;dr

CPAC endorsed Ken Paxton in the Texas Senate runoff against John Cornyn. Paxton criticized Cornyn for missing the convention and attacked his record, while Cornyn’s campaign advisor argued that Cornyn is the stronger Republican nominee.

Community verdict

8 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ken Paxton R · TX
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ken Paxton
R · TX

Texas attorney general and Senate candidate endorsed by CPAC

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President of the United States

John Cornyn
R · TX · SEN

Incumbent senator and Senate candidate in the runoff

ALSO MENTIONED  Matt Mackowiak, Cornyn’s senior campaign advisor; Matt Schlapp, CPAC chairman

Part of a bigger story

4 OUTLETS
Ken Paxton Wins CPAC Straw Poll and Receives Endorsement

CPAC endorsed Ken Paxton in the Texas Republican Senate runoff against John Cornyn. Center outlets report the endorsement and focus on activist support and Paxton’s criticism of Cornyn, alongside a response from Cornyn’s campaign. Right-leaning outlets also report the endorsement, while foregrounding Paxton’s straw-poll win and his arguments about the SAVE Act and Senate rules.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…