Biss and Elleson debate data centers, immigration
Elleson presented his views on immigration, the war in Iran and data-center development at the forum.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYEvanston Now is a local news publisher, and the article identifies its author and reports a local candidate forum with direct quotations. The story offers limited outside verification or independent context beyond the candidates’ statements.
- Source type — A local news outlet reporting on a local congressional race and public forum.
- Author attribution — The article names its reporter.
- Transparency — It identifies the forum and venue and attributes candidates’ statements, but provides little additional sourcing.
- Editorial standards — The article is straightforward reporting; no specific corrections or standards information is provided in the story.
The story gives both candidates substantial space and quotes their positions on several issues at a named public forum. It provides some local context, but most policy claims are reported without independent evidence, responses, or broader explanatory context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives both candidates meaningful space and reports their contrasting positions on the central issues. It does not independently assess their claims or include outside perspectives, limiting the balance of context.
- Source diversity — Both candidates are quoted, but the article relies mainly on their accounts and positions.
- Counterarguments presented — The candidates’ opposing views are presented on immigration, foreign policy and data centers.
- Omitted context — There is little independent examination of the claims or policy consequences discussed.
The article uses a mostly neutral reportorial tone and presents competing candidate positions without endorsing either one. Its account focuses on the candidates’ forum remarks and does not use conspicuously partisan framing.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, with evaluative claims attributed to the candidates.
- Source selection — Both candidates are quoted on the issues emphasized in the story.
- Framing — The debate is presented as a comparison of the candidates’ positions.
Daniel Biss and John Elleson debated their positions on immigration, data centers and other issues as they seek to succeed Jan Schakowsky in Congress. Their contrasting views included Biss’s call to abolish ICE and support a data-center moratorium, and Elleson’s support for immigration-law enforcement and data-center development.
At a League of Women Voters forum in Skokie, Democratic candidate Daniel Biss and Republican candidate John Elleson answered voter questions ahead of their November race for the congressional seat held by Jan Schakowsky. Biss said ICE should be abolished and called for accountability over federal immigration agents’ conduct in Evanston; Elleson said immigration laws must be followed and criticized obstruction of police officers.
On data centers, Biss backed a national moratorium, while Elleson argued the United States should build them to compete with China and said they should supply their own electricity. They also disagreed on foreign policy: Biss criticized U.S. support for Israel, while Elleson defended the war in Iran and said President Donald Trump should go further with sanctions against Iran and Russia.
Community verdict
15 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Republican candidate for the congressional seat and participant in the debate
Democratic candidate for Congress debating his policy positions
Biss's version of this story ↗President referenced in Elleson’s comments on sanctions against Iran and Russia
Referenced through Elleson’s criticism of immigration under the Biden administration
Senator whose proposed data-center moratorium Biss supports
Current representative whose seat the candidates are seeking
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETSDiscussion · 0
Loading comments…




