So Moderate Democrats Are Just Going to Let MAGA Rig the Midterms, Huh?
Pierce criticizes Perez for joining Republicans on a procedural vote that advanced parts of their agenda.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYEsquire is an established national publication with an identifiable author, though this article is clearly opinion commentary rather than a straight news report. Its institutional credibility is stronger than the article’s polemical presentation might suggest.
- Source type — Established national publication; the article is opinion-oriented.
- Author attribution — The piece names Charles P. Pierce as its author.
- Editorial standards — Esquire has an established editorial operation, though this text is commentary rather than reported analysis.
- Transparency — The piece identifies Politico as the source of quoted reporting.
The article includes a named source for some reporting and a vote tally, but is primarily a sharply opinionated argument. It offers little context for the underlying measure or procedural vote and presents limited opposing reasoning.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece is an openly one-sided opinion column. It quotes Gottheimer and the Democratic leaders’ criticism of Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez, but does not provide the lawmakers’ reasoning for their votes or a substantial counterargument.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is overtly argumentative and uses insults and derisive descriptions.
- Counterarguments presented — No explanation from Golden or Gluesenkamp Perez for their procedural vote is included.
- Source diversity — A Politico excerpt and Democratic leaders’ statement appear, but the range of perspectives is narrow.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses loaded terms such as “poltroons” and “sellouts.”
The article strongly criticizes moderate Democrats for actions it portrays as aiding Republicans and describes the SAVE Act as a voter-suppression measure. Its language and framing express a clear left-leaning perspective.
- Language tone — Uses strongly condemnatory labels for Democrats who crossed party lines.
- Framing — Frames support for the elections provision as enabling voter suppression and helping the Republican agenda.
- Source selection — Includes a quoted account from Politico and selected Democratic statements, but little rationale from supporters of the votes.
Charles P. Pierce criticizes moderate Democrats who supported a measure backing the SAVE America Act and says Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez also helped Republicans advance a House procedural vote. House Democratic leaders called the pair’s vote a breach of trust.
Pierce condemns a group of Democrats for supporting a measure condemning socialism that also included a provision backing the SAVE America Act. Josh Gottheimer, joined by Hillary Scholten, Jared Moskowitz and Thomas Suozzi, sought an amendment to remove the elections provision; the amendment was not approved for a floor vote. Gottheimer said the provision was the SAVE Act “with a wrapper on it.”
Pierce also criticizes Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez for joining Republicans on a procedural vote that passed 210–208 and revived parts of the Republican agenda. The article says five Republicans had broken ranks, and quotes House Democratic leaders Hakeem Jeffries and Katherine Clark calling the Democrats’ action a “significant breach of trust.” Pierce faults the leaders’ handling of the vote and praises Nancy Pelosi’s past leadership by comparison.
Community verdict
11 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →Democratic representative criticized for supporting the elections provision and joining Republicans on a House procedural vote
Democratic representative criticized for crossing party lines on a House procedural vote and supporting the elections provision
Golden's version of this story ↗
Democratic representative who opposed the elections provision and sought an amendment to remove it
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
House Democratic leader who criticized Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez’s vote
Former House speaker invoked as a favorable comparison on legislative leadership
Democratic whip who criticized Golden and Gluesenkamp Perez’s vote
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
Democratic representative who joined Gottheimer in seeking an amendment
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
Democratic representative who joined Gottheimer in seeking an amendment
Democratic representative who joined Gottheimer in seeking an amendment
Democratic representative listed among those who supported the elections provision
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…