MAGA's Latest Galaxy-Brained Strategy to Rig Elections Isn't Quite Working Out
Pierce describes pressure on Thune as supporters seek a way to advance the SAVE America Act.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYEsquire is an established national magazine with an identifiable author and editorial operation. This page is an openly opinionated column rather than straight reporting, and institutional credibility does not make its arguments independent reporting.
- Source type — Established national publication with an editorial operation.
- Author attribution — A named columnist is credited.
- Editorial standards — The page is clearly written as commentary, distinguishing it from an ostensibly neutral report.
The column includes specific claims about the bill and attributes supporting points to NPR reporting and a named law professor. Its highly derisive framing and limited presentation of opposing arguments make it weak as balanced reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The column presents a strongly critical argument and includes no substantive defense of the bill or the proposed Senate strategy. Its limited sourced material supports the same critical perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive argument from proponents of the bill or strategy appears.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses derisive language about the proposal and its supporters.
- Source diversity — References NPR and a law professor but offers no meaningful range of viewpoints.
The column strongly criticizes MAGA supporters and their election-law strategy, using approving language for resistance to the bill and sharply derisive descriptions of its proponents.
- Language tone — Uses insults and dismissive labels for the bill’s supporters and proposed strategy.
- Framing — Frames Senate resistance as evidence of independent thought and the proposed maneuver as foolish.
- Source selection — Includes criticism of the bill from a law professor and research but no supporting case from its advocates.
Charles P. Pierce argues that pressure from MAGA supporters has not overcome Senate resistance to the SAVE America Act. He criticizes a proposal endorsed by Sen. Mike Lee to have Vice President JD Vance preside over the Senate as a way to advance the bill.
Pierce writes that the SAVE America Act has stalled in the Senate amid pressure on Majority Leader John Thune and demands from Trump supporters to end the filibuster. He says the bill would require voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship when registering, and cites reporting that it could take effect while congressional primaries were underway. He also cites research and a law professor’s view that the requirement addresses a rare problem and could cause greater harm.
Pierce describes a strategy from Glenn Beck, endorsed by Sen. Mike Lee, in which Vice President JD Vance would preside over the Senate. He argues that replacing Thune with Vance could alienate Republican senators and would not solve the problem of the bill’s earlier failure to pass.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSED
No good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Thune in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Thune’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →
President mentioned in connection with Republican incumbents
Senator who endorsed the proposed strategy
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSOutlets describe Senate resistance and a lack of votes for the SAVE America Act, with John Thune central to the debate over its prospects. Left-leaning outlets frame resistance as holding against pressure from supporters and a proposed maneuver to advance the bill. Right-leaning outlets emphasize the shortage of Republican votes and Thune's argument that a larger Republican majority is needed.
- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 67
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…