Ted Cruz Rides To The Rescue Of Trump's Appalling 9/11 Lie
The article challenges Trump's account of his experience after the September 11 attacks and reports Cruz's defense of it.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a politically oriented blog, and the article’s openly adversarial framing makes it less suitable as a neutral source. It includes direct interview quotations, but provides little independent sourcing or documentation for its central claims.
- Source type — Politically oriented blog with an explicitly partisan presentation.
- Editorial standards — The article uses advocacy-style language rather than a neutral reporting voice.
- Transparency — It identifies the CNN interview and quotes participants, but offers limited supporting documentation.
- Author attribution — An author is named.
The article includes direct quotations from Cruz and Collins, but its framing is highly opinionated and it provides little sourcing or context beyond the interview and the author’s assertions. The central claim about the absence of public evidence is not supported with cited records or independent sources.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Cruz’s remarks from the interview but surrounds them with strongly critical commentary. It offers little context or additional sourcing to test the competing claims.
- Loaded language — The article repeatedly uses disparaging and emotionally charged language.
- Counterarguments presented — Cruz’s defense is quoted, but the article does not develop his reasoning beyond the brief interview excerpt.
- Source diversity — The account relies primarily on the CNN interview and the author’s assertions.
- Omitted context — It supplies little independent context or evidence concerning the disputed account.
The article strongly criticizes Cruz and Trump through loaded language and a one-sided framing. Its treatment is clearly left-leaning rather than a neutral account of the interview.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “despicable,” “indefensible,” and “godawful” to condemn the figures discussed.
- Framing — Frames Cruz’s comments as a defense of a lie and presents the author’s disagreement as the dominant perspective.
- Source selection — Includes the CNN interview exchange but no additional independent perspectives.
The article criticizes Sen. Ted Cruz for defending President Donald Trump’s account of his experience after the September 11 attacks. It says there is no public evidence for Trump’s claim that firefighters carried him away from a nearby building.
The article reports that Cruz defended Trump during a CNN interview with Kaitlan Collins. Cruz said he believed Trump was conveying what he experienced and described September 11 as traumatic for the country. The article characterizes Trump’s account as false and criticizes Cruz’s response.
Community verdict
2 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose account of his experience after the September 11 attacks is defended by Cruz and challenged by the author
Senator criticized for defending Trump’s account during a CNN interview.
Cruz's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Ted Cruz defended Donald Trump’s account of being carried away by firefighters after 9/11, and that the coverage reports no evidence supporting the account. Left-leaning outlets portray Cruz’s defense as a target of criticism, while center outlets emphasize the lack of evidence for Trump’s claims and note Cruz’s call to give the president the benefit of the doubt.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 52
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

