Ron Johnson Claims Vaccines Cause SIDS
Johnson discussed a removed study linking SIDS potentially to vaccines and cited statistics he said he had not yet memorized.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is identified as a blog, a source type that generally warrants more caution than an established newsroom. The article identifies its author and includes a direct quotation, but provides little evidence of broader editorial or fact-checking practices.
- Source type — A blog; a weaker institutional credibility prior than an established news organization.
- Editorial standards — The passage does not establish formal editorial or fact-checking standards.
- Author attribution — An author is named.
- Transparency — The article identifies the television program and quotes Johnson, but offers limited sourcing beyond the excerpt.
The article provides a direct quotation of Johnson’s remarks, but does not independently examine the cited study or statistics, and offers no outside expert or response. Its strongly evaluative language makes it more commentary than a fully sourced report.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Johnson’s remarks directly, but does not present independent analysis of the study or statistics, nor a response from the program. The author’s criticism dominates the piece.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Johnson, the broadcaster, or an independent source is included beyond Johnson’s quoted remarks.
- Loaded language — The author uses strongly condemnatory and insulting language.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and judgment occupy a substantial part of the short article.
- Source diversity — The article relies on Johnson’s excerpt and the author’s assessment.
The article takes a strongly critical stance toward Johnson and uses dismissive language about his remarks and the political context. Its framing is clearly left-leaning rather than neutral reporting.
- Language tone — Uses highly disparaging descriptions of Johnson and his remarks.
- Framing — Presents Johnson’s appearance as spreading conspiracy theories and emphasizes the danger of airing the claims.
- Source selection — Includes Johnson’s remarks but no independent expert or other perspective.
Sen. Ron Johnson used a television appearance to argue that a removed study linking vaccines and SIDS showed a strong correlation, while acknowledging he had not verified the statistics he cited. The article criticizes Johnson’s remarks and the show for airing them without a disclaimer.
On Real America’s Voice, Sen. Ron Johnson criticized the integrity of scientific research and peer review. He said a removed study had linked SIDS potentially to vaccines and cited statistics from VAERS, while acknowledging that he had just read them and had not memorized them properly.
The author calls Johnson’s remarks anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, argues that VAERS reports do not necessarily indicate an actual problem, and criticizes the program for airing the claims without a disclaimer.
Community verdict
9 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose television remarks about vaccines and SIDS are the subject of the article
Referenced indirectly in the author's criticism of the political climate
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

