'Do Not Interrupt!': Rep. DeLauro Puts Sec. Mullin In His Place
Mullin interrupted DeLauro, criticized the Biden administration, and disputed her account of family separations.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a blog with an identifiable author, but this post uses overtly partisan and insulting language and provides little sourcing beyond a short hearing exchange. The excerpt offers limited evidence of broader editorial or verification practices.
- Source type — Political blog; a lower institutional-credibility prior than an established newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The post uses insults and partisan characterization rather than consistently separating reporting from opinion.
- Author attribution — The page identifies an author, John Amato.
- Transparency — The hearing exchange is presented, but the post gives little additional sourcing or verification context.
The post supplies a short exchange from a congressional hearing and identifies the speakers, but offers little context or independent corroboration for the competing claims. Its insulting commentary and one-sided framing weaken the reporting quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The post includes both officials’ words from the exchange, but its narration and conclusion strongly endorse DeLauro and condemn Mullin. It offers little context for the competing claims about children or the hearing beyond the quoted remarks.
- Loaded language — The author uses insults and strongly approving or disapproving judgments.
- Counterarguments presented — Mullin’s statements appear in the transcript, but the article does not develop or verify his claims.
- Source diversity — The piece draws primarily on one hearing exchange and includes no outside perspectives.
The writing strongly favors DeLauro and condemns Mullin and Comer, using explicitly hostile language and partisan labels. Its framing gives little space to Mullin’s perspective beyond the quoted exchange.
- Language tone — Uses insults and terms such as “MAGA antics” and “beneath contempt.”
- Framing — Frames DeLauro’s response favorably and Mullin’s behavior as the central wrongdoing.
- Source selection — Relies on the hearing exchange and does not provide additional perspectives or context.
At a House hearing on the Department of Homeland Security’s 2027 budget, Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro and Secretary Markwayne Mullin clashed over interruptions and family separations. Rep. Mark E. Amodei intervened to preserve members’ speaking time.
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing on the Department of Homeland Security’s 2027 budget, DeLauro said 3,900 children had been separated from their families. Mullin countered that 450,000 children were lost during the Biden administration. DeLauro told Mullin not to interrupt her, and the two exchanged further sharp remarks.
DeLauro asked committee chair Amodei to intervene. Amodei said members should receive their allotted speaking time and that Mullin could respond later. The article praises DeLauro and Amodei, criticizes Mullin’s conduct, and says Rep. James Comer laughs when similar incidents happen.
Community verdict
5 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Homeland Security secretary challenged by DeLauro during the hearing
Ranking member who challenged Mullin during the hearing
DeLauro's version of this story ↗Representative mentioned as a contrast to Amodei’s response
Referenced in a comparison of Mullin’s conduct
Committee chair who intervened to enforce members’ speaking time
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSAt a House hearing, Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Rep. Rosa DeLauro had a heated exchange over immigration and family separations; Mullin interrupted her and disputed her account. Left-leaning outlets emphasize Mullin’s interruptions and, in The Daily Beast, the accuracy of his claim about lost children. Right-leaning outlets present Mullin’s accusation of hypocrisy over child separation as central to his challenge to DeLauro’s account.
- ARTICLES
- 5
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 52
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




