Another Republican Is Sad That ICE Is Deporting His Family Member
LePage criticized the deportation of a family member while continuing to support ICE’s immigration crackdown.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a blog with an openly opinionated presentation, which lowers confidence in its institutional editorial safeguards. The article identifies The Washington Post as the source of its reporting and includes attributed remarks from LePage, but provides little independent sourcing or context.
- Source type — Recorded as a blog; the page is explicitly partisan in tone.
- Author attribution — An author is identified, and the article attributes its reported account to The Washington Post.
- Editorial standards — The piece uses polemical language and does not present a formal reporting process or corrections information.
- Source selection — It provides LePage’s quoted remarks but little additional sourcing or response from other perspectives.
The piece includes attributed quotations and identifies the Washington Post as the source of the reported family situation, but offers little corroborating evidence or competing context. Its mocking language and strongly one-sided presentation make it more commentary than balanced reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives LePage’s quoted position but surrounds it with explicit condemnation and does not include a defense of the enforcement policy or additional perspectives. Its loaded wording makes the presentation strongly one-sided.
- Counterarguments presented — LePage’s position is quoted, but no broader defense of the policy is presented.
- Loaded language — The article uses mocking and condemnatory language throughout.
- Source diversity — The account relies principally on LePage’s quoted remarks and the author’s assertions.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and judgment are prominent alongside the reported remarks.
The article uses sharply critical language toward Republicans, LePage, ICE, and Trump, and frames the family deportation as evidence of hypocrisy. Its wording and selection of claims present a strongly left-leaning perspective.
- Language tone — Uses derisive phrasing such as “OH REALLY” and “You played yourself.”
- Framing — Frames LePage’s position as hypocritical and the deportation policy as inhumane.
- Source selection — Includes LePage’s remarks but gives no supporting perspective for the enforcement policy.
Paul LePage, a Republican House candidate, criticized the planned deportation of a family member while continuing to support ICE’s immigration crackdown, which he says should focus more on people who entered the country illegally. The article presents his comments as a contradiction.
The article says The Washington Post reported that LePage objected to the planned deportation of his son’s father-in-law, whom he described as legally in the country and holding a work permit. LePage said the man “should be allowed to stay.” The article notes that border safety is a central issue in LePage’s campaign.
The article also says LePage continues to support ICE’s immigration crackdown but favors targeting people who entered illegally, gangs, and criminals rather than people with work permits who have lived in the country for decades. The author criticizes this position as inconsistent with the effects of the crackdown on LePage’s family member.
Community verdict
5 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President referenced in the article’s criticism of immigration enforcement
Part of a bigger story
14 OUTLETSMaine congressional candidate Paul LePage said a relative with work authorization is facing deportation and that he believes immigration enforcement should prioritize people with criminal records or gang ties. Left-leaning outlets frame his objection as a contradiction with his support for ICE enforcement. Center outlets report both his objection and his enforcement views, with some adding arrest data, a DHS response or campaign criticism.
- ARTICLES
- 17
- OUTLETS
- 14
- AVG CRED
- 61
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

