Yet more government by whim | Sen. Angus King
King says Trump makes major decisions without adequate analysis or consultation and does not heed some expert warnings.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Centralmaine.com, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Centralmaine.com is an established regional news publisher, but this page is an opinion essay by a public official rather than independent reporting. The author's identity and viewpoint are clear.
- Source type — An established regional news outlet, though the page is opinion content.
- Author attribution — The essay is clearly attributed to Sen. Angus King.
- Transparency — The page identifies its author and presents the piece as a column, making its perspective apparent.
The essay presents a coherent argument and gives several concrete examples, but its claims rely largely on King's assertions and generalized references to reports and experts. It provides little supporting documentation and no response from the administration or other perspectives.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a clearly attributed opinion essay presenting King's criticism without an opposing perspective or detailed evidence supporting the administration's decisions. Its viewpoint is transparent, but the account is substantially one-sided.
- Counterarguments presented — No administration response or defense of the cited decisions is included.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as King's opinion, not as a neutral news report.
- Source diversity — The argument is delivered by one author without independent or opposing sources.
- Loaded language — Several examples are described in emphatic, critical terms.
The essay uses forceful criticism of the Trump administration and its decisions, with no comparable defense of the administration's approach. Its framing and word choice lean left.
- Language tone — Uses emphatic critical language, including describing decisions as bad and the administration's process as deficient.
- Framing — Frames the administration's decisions as products of whim and inadequate consultation.
- Source selection — The piece is solely the author's argument and includes no administration response.
Republished
Republished from Portland Press Herald. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
80 stories · 77–79 · updated Oct 6, 2026
This is Portland Press Herald's own score, and this article is credited to Portland Press Herald. The host score in the Source Check is Centralmaine.com's.
In an opinion essay, Sen. Angus King argues that the Trump administration makes major decisions without adequate data, risk analysis or expert consultation. He cites the Iran war, trade tensions with Canada and an aircraft-carrier redesign as examples.
King argues that major decisions should follow a process of gathering evidence, weighing risks and benefits, and consulting experts. He says the Trump administration instead makes decisions with little serious analysis and that a culture of fear and intimidation discourages pushback.
As examples, King cites the war with Iran, trade tensions with Canada and an aircraft-carrier redesign. He also says Tulsi Gabbard warned Trump about the likely consequences of bombing Iran, and argues that Pete Hegseth’s removal of senior military officers has weakened the advice reaching the administration.
Community verdict
4 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →President whose decision-making King criticizes
Senator and author criticizing the administration's decision-making process
King's version of this story ↗
Official whom King says warned Trump about the consequences of bombing Iran
Secretary of Defense criticized for purging senior military officers
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…