Susan Collins has no comment on Republicans holding Fauci in contempt; Angus King criticizes move
Collins declined to comment after fellow Republicans voted to hold Fauci in contempt.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Centralmaine.com, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Centralmaine.com is a regional news outlet with an identified author and a reported article that attributes statements to officials and spokespersons. The text does not provide enough information to assess its corrections practices directly.
- Source type — Established local-news publisher covering Maine politics.
- Author attribution — The article identifies its author and names a spokesperson as the source of Collins’ response.
- Editorial standards — The report attributes claims and statements to named speakers and includes responses from different sides.
- Correction history — The article provides no direct evidence about the publisher’s corrections record.
The article gives the vote tally, explains the immediate procedural next step, and includes perspectives from King, Paul, Democrats on the committee, the Justice Department and Fauci’s lawyer. The outcome remains uncertain, and the article does not include a direct response from Fauci.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article explains the committee’s action and includes arguments and reactions from both supporters and critics, along with the Justice Department’s response. Collins’ lack of comment leaves her position on the action unstated.
- Counterarguments presented — King, Democrats and Fauci’s lawyer criticize the proceeding, while Paul’s rationale and actions are reported.
- Source diversity — The report includes lawmakers, a department spokesperson and Fauci’s lawyer.
- Omitted context — The article notes that the resolution may face procedural and legal hurdles, but the next steps are unknown.
- Loaded language — Strong characterizations are attributed to King and Fauci’s lawyer rather than presented as the reporter’s own judgment.
The report uses mostly neutral language and presents statements and actions from supporters and critics of the contempt move. Its account does not clearly favor either side.
- Source selection — It includes comments or positions from King, Paul, committee Democrats, the Justice Department and Fauci’s lawyer.
- Language tone — The article primarily uses descriptive wording and attributes evaluative phrases to their speakers.
- Framing — The headline and opening foreground contrasting responses from the two Maine senators.
Republished
Republished from Portland Press Herald. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
Not enough stories yet: 7 of 10.
A Senate committee voted along party lines to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt, and Maine Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King responded differently: Collins declined to comment, while King criticized the move. The resolution was sent to the Justice Department, which said it was reviewing it.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted 8-5 to hold former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci in contempt after he invoked the Fifth Amendment during a hearing. Committee chair Rand Paul said he would send the resolution to the Justice Department; the department said it was reviewing the resolution, and the article reports that what happens next remains unclear.
Susan Collins and her office declined to comment. Angus King called the hearing politically motivated, while saying that a full accounting of the pandemic response was worthwhile. Democrats on the committee criticized Paul’s decision to send the resolution directly to the Justice Department.
Community verdict
24 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Maine senator who declined to comment on the contempt vote
Maine senator who criticized the committee’s contempt proceeding
King's version of this story ↗President who suggested Fauci should be prosecuted
Former president who pardoned Fauci
Democratic Senate candidate running against Collins
Committee chair who led the contempt effort and said he would send the resolution to the Justice Department
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 2
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 76
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





