Skip to main content
1 min read
◆ Mixed look for SuozziBudget / Spending

Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund

Suozzi co-introduced the bill and said the fund would set a dangerous precedent.

Bipartisan House bill would ban use of federal money for DOJ's "anti-weaponization" fund
Image · CBS News

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityCBS News84/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 6, 2026
CBS News
May 21, 2026
tl;dr

Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick and Tom Suozzi introduced a bipartisan bill to bar federal money from paying claims through the Justice Department’s nearly $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund. Opposition to the fund also stalled Republican plans for an immigration and border-security funding package.

Community verdict

18 VOTES
How does this story look for
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →

New York representative and co-sponsor of the bill

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Pennsylvania representative and co-sponsor of the bill

Fitzpatrick's version of this story ↗
Todd Blanche
R · Attorney General

Acting attorney general asked by Fitzpatrick to provide information about the fund

Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose IRS lawsuit was settled through the arrangement that created the fund

Part of a bigger story

4 OUTLETS
Suozzi and Fitzpatrick Introduce Bill to Block DOJ Fund Payments

Suozzi and Fitzpatrick introduced a bipartisan bill to block federal payments through the Justice Department’s nearly $1.8 billion fund. Center outlets focus on the bill’s limits on fund payments, with coverage also noting Suozzi’s appeal to Republicans and the dispute around the fund. Right-leaning outlets frame it as a Republican joining a Democrat to stop the fund and note Fitzpatrick’s concern about transparency.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…