Skip to main content
1 min read
● InformationalTaxes

Trump's MAGA Inc. Pours $10 Million into Ken Paxton's Senate Race

MAGA Inc. plans to spend $5 million promoting Paxton in the Texas Senate race.

Trump's MAGA Inc. Pours $10 Million into Ken Paxton's Senate Race
Image · Breitbart

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityBreitbart41/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Sep 28, 2026
Breitbart
Sep 5, 2026
tl;dr

Donald Trump’s MAGA Inc. super PAC plans to spend at least $10 million supporting Ken Paxton and opposing James Talarico in the Texas Senate race. A Federal Election Commission filing shows the planned spending, which the article describes as the group’s first reported investment in the fall campaign.

Community verdict

10 VOTES
How does this story look for
Ken Paxton R · TX
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ken Paxton
R · TX

Republican Senate candidate receiving support from MAGA Inc.

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President whose super PAC is spending in the race

Trump's version of this story ↗

Democratic Senate candidate and target of MAGA Inc.’s planned spending

Representative and former Democratic Senate primary candidate defeated by Talarico

Darline Graham
R · SC · SEN

Senator whose South Carolina campaign previously benefited from a MAGA Inc. payment

John Cornyn
R · TX · SEN

Senator and former Republican Senate primary candidate defeated by Paxton

Part of a bigger story

30 OUTLETS
MAGA Inc. Announces $10 Million Ad Campaign Supporting Paxton

MAGA Inc. committed $10 million to advertising in the Texas Senate race, including ads supporting Ken Paxton and opposing James Talarico. Left-leaning outlets question whether outside spending can improve Paxton’s prospects, stressing campaign difficulties and Republican concern. Center outlets describe the $10 million buy as a major intervention in a competitive race, with ads for Paxton and against Talarico. Right-leaning outlets emphasize the investment backing Paxton, while some also note the race is closely watched.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…